Skip to main content

Is method.ac a Scam? Security Check Results - Duopixel Reviews

method.ac favicon

Is method.ac Safe? Security Analysis for Duopixel

Check if method.ac is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

EducationCanadasmall
HTML5CSS3JavaScript
Analyzed 8/3/2025Completed 11:42:03 AM
49
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Method of Action is a small Canadian educational platform focused on providing free design learning tools, games, and a simple vector editor. Founded in 2011 and operated by Duopixel and Mark MacKay, it targets design learners and creative individuals with a niche offering of interactive educational content. The website is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and professionally presented, with clear contact information and open source transparency via GitHub. Technically, it uses standard web technologies hosted on DigitalOcean, but lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC. Security posture is good with HTTPS and domain transfer protection but could be improved with additional security policies and cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the site is safe, trustworthy, and compliant with basic privacy standards, though GDPR compliance is not explicitly demonstrated.

Detected Technologies

HTML5CSS3JavaScript

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business operates as a free educational resource with optional donations, positioning itself in a niche market of design education. It leverages open source tools and personal branding of its creator, Mark MacKay, who is also professionally affiliated with Invopop. The platform's competitive advantage lies in its unique educational games and tools that engage users interactively. Revenue streams appear limited to donations. The partnership with Invopop adds credibility. The site shows consistent branding and a clear target audience of learners and educators in design.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

m*****@method.ac

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protection. However, it lacks DNSSEC, security headers, and formal security or incident response policies. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present. The absence of cookie consent and tracking scripts reduces privacy risks but also indicates limited privacy compliance measures. The site is free from visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are minimal, reflecting a small-scale operation with basic security awareness.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Duopixel

Description:

Method of Action creates tools, toys and games to help you learn design, for free. It is the creative endeavor of Mark MacKay, a Product Designer at Invopop.

Key Services:
Educational games for design practiceOnline vector editor (Method Draw)Creative work logs and writing
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5CSS3JavaScript
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:icloud.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 68 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

2 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
14 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(201 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:167.99.4.132
Name Servers:
ns1.digitalocean.com
ns2.digitalocean.com
ns3.digitalocean.com
MX Records:
10: mx02.mail.icloud.com
10: mx01.mail.icloud.com
SOA:Serial: 1740405209, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:108ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:icloud.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

40/100
Score

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a clean and modern HTML5 and CSS3 stack with JavaScript for interactivity, including dark mode toggling. Hosting is provided by DigitalOcean with their nameservers. The site is mobile responsive and SEO optimized with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. No CMS or frameworks are detected, indicating a custom or static site approach. Performance is moderate with no heavy external dependencies or analytics scripts. Accessibility is basic but functional. Technical risks include lack of DNSSEC and missing security headers, which could be addressed to reduce attack surface and improve resilience.
Analyze Another Website