Skip to main content

Is methprotocol.xyz a Scam? Security Check Results - Mantle Reviews

methprotocol.xyz favicon

Is methprotocol.xyz Safe? Security Analysis for Mantle

Check if methprotocol.xyz is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/amedium
ReactNext.jsJavaScriptLayerZero OFT Standard
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 8:56:15 AM
66
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

mETH Protocol, developed by Mantle, is a pioneering platform offering institutional-grade ETH liquid staking and restaking services. It provides users with value-accumulating receipt tokens (mETH and cmETH) that represent staked ETH and restaked positions across multiple protocols. The platform is positioned as the first fully vertically integrated staking and restaking protocol, targeting institutional investors and sophisticated crypto users. The ecosystem includes partnerships with reputable staking node operators and multiple security audits, enhancing its market credibility. Technically, the website leverages a modern React and Next.js stack, ensuring fast performance, excellent mobile optimization, and good accessibility. The use of LayerZero OFT Standard for cross-chain bridging adds to its technical sophistication. SEO and metadata are well implemented, supporting discoverability and user engagement. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and includes standard security headers, reflecting good security hygiene. However, it lacks a visible cookie consent mechanism and explicit security or incident response policies, which are important for regulatory compliance and user trust. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Overall, mETH Protocol presents a professional, trustworthy, and technically sound platform with strong business credibility. To further enhance its security posture and compliance, it should implement cookie consent, publish security policies, and provide clear contact information for incident reporting.

Detected Technologies

ReactNext.jsJavaScriptLayerZero OFT Standard

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

mETH Protocol occupies a unique niche in the ETH staking ecosystem by combining staking and restaking into a unified, vertically integrated protocol. Its business model revolves around providing liquid staking receipt tokens that can be leveraged in DeFi and centralized finance applications, enhancing capital efficiency. The governance token COOK empowers community participation in ecosystem decisions. The platform's partnerships with established staking operators and auditors indicate a robust operational foundation. The target market includes institutional investors and crypto treasury managers, evidenced by the large ETH treasury holdings and strategic content. Growth potential is supported by multi-chain bridging capabilities and integration with emerging restaking protocols like EigenLayer and Symbiotic.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and no visible exposure of sensitive information. The presence of multiple third-party audits adds confidence in the underlying protocol's security. However, the absence of a published security policy, incident response plan, and vulnerability disclosure mechanism limits transparency and preparedness for security incidents. The lack of cookie consent and GDPR compliance indicators also represents a compliance gap. Overall, the security maturity is good but can be improved by formalizing policies and enhancing user privacy controls.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement a visible cookie consent banner to comply with privacy regulations and improve transparency.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Mantle

Description:

mETH Protocol is the first fully vertically integrated staking and restaking protocol in the market, built by Mantle.

Key Services:
ETH liquid stakingETH liquid restakingUnified receipt tokens (mETH and cmETH)Cross-chain bridgingGovernance via COOK token
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
ReactNext.jsJavaScriptLayerZero OFT Standard
Frameworks:
Next.js
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries
  • No forms collecting sensitive data without protection

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
cookie3.analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
cookie3.analytics (markfi.xyz)
Marketing Tools:
cookie3.analytics
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

85/100
Score

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "origin-when-cross-origin"

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 36 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:76.76.21.21
Name Servers:
ns-1225.awsdns-25.orgDNS only
ns-1978.awsdns-55.co.ukDNS only
ns-707.awsdns-24.netDNS only
ns-91.awsdns-11.comDNS only
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:134ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a modern React and Next.js framework, ensuring fast load times and excellent mobile responsiveness. The use of LayerZero OFT Standard for token bridging indicates advanced blockchain integration capabilities. The site is well-structured with proper meta tags and SEO optimization. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or headless CMS approach. Hosting details are not explicit but performance and accessibility are strong. The analytics implementation uses a third-party script (cookie3.analytics) without a consent mechanism, which should be addressed. Overall, the technical infrastructure is robust with minor areas for improvement in privacy and compliance tooling.
Analyze Another Website