Skip to main content

Is mezaattistibasfonds.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - Latvijas Meža Attīstības Fonds Reviews

mezaattistibasfonds.lv favicon

Is mezaattistibasfonds.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Latvijas Meža Attīstības Fonds

Check if mezaattistibasfonds.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

Real EstateLatviasmall
Google Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsFacebook PixelCookiebotGoogle Maps API
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 12:07:23 AM
48
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Latvijas Meža Attīstības Fonds is a Latvian forestry fund focused on acquiring and managing forest lands sustainably. The company offers services including forest land purchase, fund area management, and responsible forestry practices aimed at preserving environmental diversity and increasing forest value. Their target audience includes private forest owners and companies interested in forestry investments and management within Latvia. The website is professionally designed with clear navigation and content relevant to their business domain. Technically, the website employs modern tracking and analytics technologies such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Google Tag Manager, and Cookiebot for consent management. The site is mobile optimized and uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration. However, some security headers are missing, and no explicit security or incident response policies are published. The website demonstrates moderate user tracking balanced with GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanisms. From a security perspective, the site benefits from HTTPS and secure form handling but lacks advanced security headers and a vulnerability disclosure policy. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The absence of WHOIS data limits the ability to fully verify domain legitimacy, but the website content aligns well with the claimed business. Overall, the site presents a good security posture with room for improvement in security policy transparency and header implementation. The overall risk is moderate with no immediate red flags. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing a security.txt file, and improving accessibility features. These steps will strengthen trust and compliance while supporting the company’s professional image and operational security.

Detected Technologies

Google Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsFacebook PixelCookiebotGoogle Maps API

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company operates in the niche forestry and real estate sector in Latvia, focusing on sustainable forest management and land acquisition. Their business model revolves around purchasing forest lands from private owners and companies, managing these lands responsibly, and promoting sustainable forestry practices. This positions them as a specialized fund with a clear environmental and economic value proposition. The presence of a contact form, social media, and clear service descriptions indicates an active engagement strategy with their target market. The company appears to be small-sized with a localized market focus. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified. The website content and branding are consistent, supporting a trustworthy market presence.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@mezaattistibasfonds.lv

Phone Numbers (1)

+3712800****

Physical Addresses (1)

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a good baseline security posture with HTTPS enforced and secure form inputs. Cookie consent is actively managed via Cookiebot, indicating GDPR awareness. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces defense-in-depth. No incident response or security policy pages were found, which could hinder rapid response to security events. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of third-party analytics and tracking scripts introduces moderate user tracking but is balanced with consent mechanisms. Overall, the security maturity is moderate with clear opportunities for improvement in policy transparency and header implementation.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Latvijas Meža Attīstības Fonds

Description:

Latvijas Meža Attīstības Fonds offers services related to forest land acquisition, forest area management, and responsible forestry in Latvia. They focus on sustainable forest management, environmental preservation, and providing competitive offers to forest owners.

Key Services:
Meža platību iepirkšanaFonda platību apsaimniekošanaAtbildīga mežizstrāde
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Google Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsFacebook PixelCookiebotGoogle Maps API
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • Secure form inputs with validation

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsFacebook Pixel
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Facebook Pixel
Marketing Tools:
Cookiebot
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

65/100
Score

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "same-origin"

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 82 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:89.111.20.80
Name Servers:
ns1.dns.lvDNS only
ns2.dns.lvDNS only
MX Records:
50: mezaattistibasfonds-lv.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 1732192264, TTL: 900s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:360ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

0/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

CRITICAL

Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern technology stack including Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Cookiebot for cookie consent, and Google Maps API for location services. The HTML is well-structured with responsive design elements ensuring good mobile optimization. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts to improve page load times. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph tags for social sharing. No CMS or hosting provider information is explicitly detected. The site could benefit from additional technical enhancements such as improved accessibility features and security header implementation to reduce technical debt and improve resilience.
Analyze Another Website