Skip to main content

Is mfah.org a Scam? Security Check Results - The Museum of Fine Arts, Houston Reviews

T

Is mfah.org Safe? Security Analysis for The Museum of Fine Arts, Houston

Check if mfah.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

Non-profitUnited Stateslarge
Blazor ServerBootstrap 4FontAwesomePhotoSwipeGoogle Fonts+4 more
Analyzed 9/7/2025Completed 10:42:17 AM
64
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The Museum of Fine Arts, Houston (MFAH) operates as a prominent non-profit cultural institution providing extensive art exhibitions, educational programs, film screenings, and community engagement activities. The website reflects a well-established entity with a strong regional presence, targeting a broad audience including art enthusiasts, families, educators, and students. The business model relies on memberships, donations, ticket sales, and grants, positioning MFAH as a leading museum in Houston with a comprehensive offering of services and events. Technically, the website employs modern technologies such as Blazor Server, Bootstrap 4, and integrates multiple third-party libraries and services including Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Microsoft Application Insights. The infrastructure suggests hosting on Microsoft Azure or similar cloud platforms, ensuring good performance, mobile optimization, and accessibility. The site demonstrates strong digital maturity with fast loading times, responsive design, and clear navigation. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS, uses Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection, and leverages Application Insights for monitoring. While explicit security headers are not fully confirmed, best practices appear to be followed with no exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries detected. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms. However, the site could improve by publishing a dedicated security policy, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure information. Overall, the risk assessment is low with a high trustworthiness rating. The domain WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to privacy protection, which is justified for this type of non-profit organization. The website is professional, secure, and compliant, making it a reliable digital presence for MFAH.

Detected Technologies

Blazor ServerBootstrap 4FontAwesomePhotoSwipeGoogle Fontsintl-tel-inputGoogle AnalyticsFacebook PixelGoogle reCAPTCHA

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

MFAH holds a strong market position as a leading art museum in Houston, serving a diverse audience through exhibitions, educational programs, and cultural events. Its competitive advantage lies in its extensive collections, community engagement, and multi-channel offerings including film and dining. Revenue streams include memberships, ticket sales, donations, and grants. The museum maintains partnerships with media outlets and cultural organizations, enhancing its visibility and influence. Growth indicators include active event calendars, news coverage, and digital engagement. The website supports these operations with integrated marketing and analytics tools, facilitating audience targeting and fundraising efforts.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

g*****@mfah.org

Phone Numbers (1)

713*******

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforcement, use of bot mitigation via Google reCAPTCHA, and monitoring through Microsoft Application Insights. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found. Privacy policies and cookie consent mechanisms indicate compliance with GDPR and related regulations. However, the absence of explicit security headers and incident response information suggests room for improvement. The lack of a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file limits transparency. Overall, the security culture appears proactive but could benefit from enhanced documentation and communication of security practices.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and verify comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

The Museum of Fine Arts, Houston

Description:

The Museum of Fine Arts, Houston (MFAH) is a non-profit cultural institution offering art exhibitions, educational programs, film screenings, and community engagement. It serves the Houston community and visitors with a broad range of art collections and events.

Key Services:
Art exhibitionsFilm screeningsEducational programsMembership and donationsMuseum shop and dining
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Blazor ServerBootstrap 4FontAwesomePhotoSwipeGoogle Fontsintl-tel-inputGoogle AnalyticsFacebook PixelGoogle reCAPTCHA
Frameworks:
Blazor
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Application Insights for monitoring

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsMicrosoft Application InsightsFacebook Pixel
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Simpli.fiAlpixTrack
Tracking Pixels:
Facebook Pixel
Marketing Tools:
Facebook Pixel
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

35/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "same-origin"

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

58/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

65/100
Score

Complex SPF record

LOW

Too many include statements can cause lookup limits

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 mx include:spf.myconnectwise.net include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:_spf.ultipro.com include:emsd1.com include:spf.dynect.net include:rp.oracleemaildelivery.com -all
DNS Lookups:7/10
Policy:-all
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:6b016cbb@mxtoolbox.dmarc-report.com
Forensic Reports:6b016cbb@forensics.dmarc-report.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

65/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 42 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:www.mfah.org
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:10/19/2025 (42 days)
SANs:www.mfah.org

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
29 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
medium(76 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:13.85.197.213
Name Servers:
ns1.pslightwave.com
ns2.pslightwave.com
MX Records:
5: mfah-org.mail.protection.outlook.com

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a modern technology stack featuring Blazor Server for dynamic content, Bootstrap 4 for responsive design, and FontAwesome for icons. It leverages cloud hosting likely on Microsoft Azure, supported by Application Insights for telemetry and performance monitoring. The site integrates multiple third-party services for analytics, marketing, and user interaction, including Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Google reCAPTCHA. Performance is optimized with preconnect and preload directives, lazy loading of images, and CDN usage. Accessibility and SEO are well addressed with semantic HTML, ARIA labels, and meta tags. Technical risks are minimal but include dependency on third-party scripts which require ongoing security management.
Analyze Another Website