Skip to main content

Is mfemediaforeurope.com a Scam? Security Check Results - MFE - MEDIAFOREUROPE N.V. Reviews

M

Is mfemediaforeurope.com Safe? Security Analysis for MFE - MEDIAFOREUROPE N.V.

Check if mfemediaforeurope.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

MediaNetherlandslarge
Bootstrap CSSSwiper JSAOS AnimateGoogle ChartsjQuery+4 more
Analyzed 9/7/2025Completed 2:16:34 PM
66
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

MFE - MEDIAFOREUROPE N.V. operates as a leading European media group with strong Italian roots, focusing on TV and radio broadcasting, digital and on-demand content, content production, and advertising sales. The company holds significant stakes in subsidiaries including Mediaset España and ProSiebenSat.1 Media SE, positioning itself as a major player in the Italian and Spanish media markets. The website serves investors, media professionals, and the general public with comprehensive corporate, governance, sustainability, and investor information.

Detected Technologies

Bootstrap CSSSwiper JSAOS AnimateGoogle ChartsjQueryFeather IconsjsPDFGoogle Tag ManagerIubenda Cookie Solution

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company maintains a robust market position as a leading private TV publisher in Italy and Spain, complemented by a strong digital presence and diversified advertising sales network. Its business model leverages content production and multi-platform distribution to capture broad audience segments. The presence of detailed investor kits, financial reports, and stock quotes indicates a transparent and investor-focused approach. Partnerships and subsidiaries enhance its market reach and operational capabilities.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a good security posture with enforced HTTPS, use of Google Tag Manager with authentication, and a cookie consent mechanism via Iubenda. However, explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options are not evident and should be implemented to enhance protection. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of a security policy or incident response contact is noted as an area for improvement.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

MFE - MEDIAFOREUROPE N.V.

Description:

Group Mediaset Corporate Website

Key Services:
TV & Radio broadcastingDigital and On Demand contentContent productionAdvertising sales
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Bootstrap CSSSwiper JSAOS AnimateGoogle ChartsjQueryFeather IconsjsPDFGoogle Tag ManagerIubenda Cookie Solution
Frameworks:
Bootstrap
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager with authentication tokens
  • Cookie consent mechanism via Iubenda

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Marketing Tools:
AddEvent
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

70/100
Score

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 mx a ip4:91.211.156.0/22 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:selector1(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Aggregate Reports:report.dmarc_rua@mfemediaforeurope.com
Forensic Reports:report.dmarc_ruf@mfemediaforeurope.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

67/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

2 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
6 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(262 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:3.125.103.49, 3.73.23.250, 18.158.181.40
Name Servers:
ns1.register.it
ns2.register.it
MX Records:
0: mfemediaforeurope-com.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2025073102, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:153ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 mx a ip4:91.211.156.0/22 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern technology stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, Swiper for interactive sliders, AOS for animations, Google Charts for data visualization, and jQuery for DOM manipulation. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and marketing tags, with Iubenda managing cookie consent. The site is mobile-optimized with good navigation and SEO practices. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement in loading speed and accessibility compliance. No CMS or hosting provider details were identified from the HTML content.
Analyze Another Website