Skip to main content

Is mfgb.ch a Scam? Security Check Results - mfgb.ch Reviews

M

Is mfgb.ch Safe? Security Analysis for Security Verification

https://mfgb.ch

Check if mfgb.ch is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherSwitzerlandsmall
Bootstrap 5.3.3Google reCAPTCHA v3
Analyzed 10/4/2025Completed 6:39:21 AM
54
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website mfgb.ch currently presents only a security verification page employing Google reCAPTCHA v3, indicating that access to the actual content is restricted by a web application firewall or bot protection mechanism. Due to this, no business-related content, contact information, or policies are accessible for analysis. The site uses modern frontend technologies such as Bootstrap 5.3.3 and integrates invisible reCAPTCHA for security. However, the lack of visible security headers and absence of privacy or cookie policies limit the assessment of its security posture and compliance. The domain WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is common for small or security-conscious entities but reduces transparency. Overall, the site’s security posture shows basic bot protection but lacks visible advanced security measures or compliance documentation. The content quality and business credibility cannot be properly assessed due to the blocked content.

Detected Technologies

Bootstrap 5.3.3Google reCAPTCHA v3

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

No business intelligence data could be extracted due to the absence of accessible content. The domain is registered with privacy protection, and no company name, address, or contact details are visible. The website appears to be in a protective mode, possibly to prevent automated scraping or attacks. Without further content, market positioning, business model, or service offerings cannot be determined.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The site employs Google reCAPTCHA v3 as a bot mitigation tool, which is a positive security measure. However, no security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options were detected in the provided HTML snippet. The SSL configuration could not be verified from the content but the URL uses HTTPS. The absence of visible privacy policies and contact information for incident response reduces compliance maturity. The security posture is basic with room for improvement in transparency and header implementation.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and expose comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Generic Detected

Page is a security verification challenge using Google reCAPTCHA v3, indicating a WAF or bot protection mechanism blocking direct access to content.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Bootstrap 5.3.3Google reCAPTCHA v3
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
40/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 for bot protection
  • Invisible reCAPTCHA integration

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is blocked behind a security verification page using Google reCAPTCHA v3.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.stackmail.com a mx -all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:-all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

95/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 62 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:*.mfgb.ch
Issuer:R12
Valid Until:12/6/2025 (62 days)
SANs:*.mfgb.ch, mfgb.ch

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:185.151.30.177
AAAA Records:2a07:7800::177
Name Servers:
ns1.1ahostingpro.chDNS only
ns2.1ahostingpro.chDNS only
ns3.1ahostingpro.chDNS only
ns4.1ahostingpro.chDNS only
MX Records:
10: mx.stackmail.com
SOA:Serial: 1633798098, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:80ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.stackmail.com a mx -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses Bootstrap 5.3.3 for styling and Google reCAPTCHA v3 for bot protection, indicating a modern frontend approach. The page is minimal and serves as a security checkpoint rather than a content page. No CMS or backend technologies are identifiable from the HTML snippet. Performance is likely moderate given the use of CDN-hosted resources. Mobile optimization appears good due to responsive Bootstrap usage. SEO and accessibility are poor due to lack of content and metadata. The site is hosted with external CDNs for scripts and styles but hosting provider details are not visible.
⭐ Verified Community Reviews

What others say about mfgb.ch

Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

out of 5

0 reviews published

Loading reviews…

How did we do?

Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.

Analyze Another Website