Skip to main content

Is mfresidence.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - SIA MFRESIDENCE Reviews

mfresidence.lv favicon

Is mfresidence.lv Safe? Security Analysis for SIA MFRESIDENCE

Check if mfresidence.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

Real EstateLatviasmall
Bootstrap 5.0.2jQuery 3.7.1SMTP.js
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 1:01:56 AM
41
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

MFRESIDENCE is a small Latvian real estate company specializing in long-term rental of modern apartments located in the center of Riga. The website presents a well-structured portfolio of one, two, and three-room apartments with quality finishes and amenities such as private parking, terraces, and security services. The company targets families and individuals seeking comfortable urban living with convenient access to city infrastructure. Technically, the website uses Bootstrap 5 and jQuery, providing a responsive and user-friendly experience, though some improvements in accessibility and SEO could be made. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS assumed but lacking explicit security headers and server-side form handling. Privacy compliance is limited, with a privacy policy page present but no cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy features.

Detected Technologies

Bootstrap 5.0.2jQuery 3.7.1SMTP.js

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company operates in the real estate rental sector, focusing on a niche market of modern apartments in Riga's central area. Its business model revolves around leasing residential units with added value services like private garages and secured premises. The presence of a company registration number and physical addresses indicates legitimate operations. The website's limited social media presence and absence of analytics suggest a modest digital marketing approach. The lack of WHOIS data limits domain trust verification, but the business appears stable and focused on local clientele. Growth potential exists through improved online presence and enhanced compliance with privacy regulations.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@mfresidence.lv

Phone Numbers (1)

+3712060****

Company Registration

Legal Name:

SIA MFRESIDENCE

Registration Number:

45403052842

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS usage but lacks critical security headers such as Content Security Policy and HSTS. The contact form uses client-side SMTP.js without a server-side endpoint, which may expose it to abuse or spam. No evidence of vulnerability disclosures or incident response policies was found. Privacy compliance is minimal, with no cookie consent or GDPR explicit indicators. The absence of WHOIS data reduces confidence in domain legitimacy. Recommendations include implementing security headers, server-side form validation, and privacy enhancements to improve overall security maturity.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

SIA MFRESIDENCE

Description:

Mūsdienīgs dzīvojamais komplekss pašā pilsētas sirdī Rīgas centrā, piedāvājot stilīgus un funkcionālus dzīvokļus ilgtermiņa īrei ar kvalitatīvu apdari un attīstītu infrastruktūru.

Key Services:
Dzīvokļu īrePrivātas autostāvvietasTerases pie daudziem dzīvokļiemVideonovērošana un apsardzeRotaļu laukums iedzīvotājiem
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Bootstrap 5.0.2jQuery 3.7.1SMTP.js
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
60/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS usage assumed (URL is https)
  • Contact form uses SMTP.js for email sending

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content in Latvian language.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

55/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1416-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Soon

HIGH

SSL certificate expires in 12 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:91.203.69.197
Name Servers:
ns.nano.lvDNS only
ns2.nano.lvDNS only
MX Records:
1: SMTP.GOOGLE.COM
SOA:Serial: 2025073007, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:439ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using Bootstrap 5 and jQuery 3.7.1, ensuring responsive design and interactive elements. External resources are loaded from reputable CDNs such as jsdelivr and Google APIs. The site uses SMTP.js for client-side email sending, which is uncommon and may pose security risks. No CMS or hosting provider information is discernible. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected. Accessibility is basic, with room for improvement in semantic markup and ARIA attributes. SEO is basic, lacking meta descriptions and structured data. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from modernization and security hardening.
Analyze Another Website