Skip to main content

Is mgstover.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Otto Reviews

mgstover.com favicon

Is mgstover.com Safe? Security Analysis for Otto

Check if mgstover.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

FinanceUnited Statesmedium
WordPress 6.8.1Google Tag ManagerGoogle Analytics (gtag.js)Gravity FormsSplide.js slider+1 more
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 3:05:05 AM
55
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Otto is a specialized technology platform focused on providing real-time crypto reporting, reconciliation, and financial recording solutions for institutional digital asset funds. The platform is developed and operated by MG Stover, LLC, a company with a decade-long history in alternative investment fund administration. Otto positions itself as a leader and pioneer in the crypto fund administration space, offering proprietary technology licensed uniquely in the ecosystem. The website reflects a professional and content-rich presence targeting institutional clients such as fund managers, CPA firms, and trading desks. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern integrations like Google Tag Manager and Gravity Forms, hosted likely on AWS infrastructure. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and domain transfer protections but lacks advanced DNS security and published security policies. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies and no visible consent mechanisms. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professionally maintained but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy transparency.

Detected Technologies

WordPress 6.8.1Google Tag ManagerGoogle Analytics (gtag.js)Gravity FormsSplide.js sliderAWS DNS hosting

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Otto operates in the finance and technology sectors, specifically targeting the institutional digital asset market. Its competitive advantage lies in its proprietary technology and deep industry experience dating back to 2014. The business model combines technology licensing with middle office and consulting services, serving a niche but growing market segment. The company maintains partnerships with major crypto platforms and custodians, enhancing its ecosystem credibility. Growth indicators include servicing over $40B in digital assets and continuous feature evolution. The website content and testimonials reinforce a strong market position and client trust. Strategic observations suggest focusing on expanding privacy and security transparency to meet evolving regulatory expectations.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer lock enabled. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers reduces the overall security posture. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is published, which could hinder rapid response to security events. The use of third-party analytics without visible cookie consent raises privacy compliance concerns. There is no evidence of data protection officer contact or formal security frameworks. The business impact of these gaps is moderate, primarily affecting regulatory compliance and user trust. Enhancing security headers, enabling DNSSEC, and publishing security policies would significantly improve the security culture and readiness.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Otto

Description:

Standardizing disparate crypto data, otto is a technology that provides accurate and complete financial recording solutions for timely reporting. Otto supports real-time monitoring, reconciliation, and reporting of crypto assets for institutional digital asset industry clients. The company has a history dating back to 2014 in servicing digital asset funds and has developed proprietary systems servicing over $40B in digital assets.

Key Services:
Real-Time MonitoringInvestment TrackingAuto Portfolio ReconciliationIntegrated ReportingMiddle Office ServicesConsulting
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPress 6.8.1Google Tag ManagerGoogle Analytics (gtag.js)Gravity FormsSplide.js sliderAWS DNS hosting
Frameworks:
WordPress
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
65/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited to prevent unauthorized transfers

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is professionally designed and content rich focused on crypto fund administration technology.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

55/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

67/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

2 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
2 years(established)
Expiry Risk
low(250 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:18.213.40.95, 44.198.113.0, 52.70.186.128
Name Servers:
ns-1520.awsdns-62.org
ns-1625.awsdns-11.co.uk
ns-52.awsdns-06.com
ns-608.awsdns-12.net
MX Records:
0: ottodigital-io.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:61ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform with integration of Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for tracking. It uses Gravity Forms for data collection and Splide.js for interactive sliders. Hosting appears to be on AWS infrastructure, indicated by DNS servers. Performance is moderate with lazy loading of images and videos, and mobile optimization is good. SEO is supported by structured JSON-LD data and meta tags. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. Technical risks include lack of DNSSEC and missing security headers, which could expose the site to certain attack vectors. The site is well maintained with no visible broken elements or errors.
Analyze Another Website