Skip to main content

Is miladymaker.net a Scam? Security Check Results - Remilia Collective Reviews

miladymaker.net favicon

Is miladymaker.net Safe? Security Analysis for Remilia Collective

Check if miladymaker.net is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
React 17.0.2Web3.jsBigNumber.js
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 5:24:57 AM
46
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Milady Maker is a niche NFT generative art project launched in 2021 by Remilia Collective, featuring a collection of 10,000 neochibi-style profile picture NFTs inspired by Japanese street fashion tribes. The project emphasizes community engagement through events such as virtual raves, Minecraft metaverse integration, and derivative expansions. The business model relies on NFT sales, secondary market trading, merchandise, and community-driven content. The website demonstrates a moderate level of digital maturity with use of React, Web3.js, and integration with blockchain platforms. However, it lacks formal privacy and cookie policies, and no explicit contact information is provided, which impacts compliance and trust. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and domain protections but could be improved by adding security headers and DNSSEC.

Detected Technologies

React 17.0.2Web3.jsBigNumber.js

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Milady Maker occupies a unique position in the NFT and digital art market, leveraging a strong cultural aesthetic and copyleft licensing to foster a vibrant ecosystem of derivative works and community projects. Its competitive advantage lies in its distinctive art style, active community, and multi-platform presence including social media, Discord, and blockchain marketplaces. Revenue streams include primary NFT sales, secondary market royalties, merchandise sales, and event participation. The target audience includes NFT collectors, digital art enthusiasts, and fans of Japanese street fashion culture. Partnerships with platforms like OpenSea and Hologram Labs enhance its ecosystem. The project is relatively young but shows signs of steady growth and community engagement.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS and benefits from domain status protections that prevent unauthorized transfers or deletions. However, it lacks published privacy and cookie policies, security headers, and DNSSEC, which are important for compliance and defense-in-depth. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, limiting transparency. The absence of contact information reduces the ability to report security issues. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by adopting standard security best practices and compliance documentation.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR and privacy compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Remilia Collective

Description:

Milady Maker is a collection of 10,000 generative pfpNFT's in a neochibi aesthetic inspired by street style tribes.

Key Services:
NFT generative art collectionCommunity events (raves, VRtube avatars, Minecraft metaverse)Derivative expansions and companion collectionsMerchandise sales
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
React 17.0.2Web3.jsBigNumber.js
Frameworks:
React
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
65/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by https URL)
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited and clientTransferProhibited

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Dune Analytics (dashboard link)
Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Marketing Tools:
TwitterDiscord
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a niche NFT generative art project with strong community focus.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Twitter, YouTube

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 82 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:159.223.197.209
Name Servers:
ns-cloud-c1.googledomains.comDNS only
ns-cloud-c2.googledomains.comDNS only
ns-cloud-c3.googledomains.comDNS only
ns-cloud-c4.googledomains.comDNS only
SOA:Serial: 36, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:55ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

40/100
Score

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern JavaScript stack including React 17 and Web3.js for blockchain interaction, indicating a contemporary technical approach. Hosting is supported by Google Cloud DNS, and the domain is registered via Squarespace Domains. Performance is moderate with audio and embedded video content, and mobile optimization is good. SEO is supported by comprehensive meta tags including Open Graph and Twitter cards. However, accessibility features are basic and no structured data (JSON-LD) was detected. The absence of security headers and DNSSEC represents technical debt and security risk. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced security and accessibility improvements.
Analyze Another Website