Skip to main content

Is miljofyrtarn.no a Scam? Security Check Results - miljofyrtarn.no Reviews

M

Is miljofyrtarn.no Safe? Security Analysis for 403 Forbidden

Check if miljofyrtarn.no is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
nginx
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 3:32:53 PM
53
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website miljofyrtarn.no is currently inaccessible, returning a 403 Forbidden error page protected by Cloudflare's Web Application Firewall (WAF). Due to this blocking, no actual website content, metadata, or business information is available for analysis. The domain was registered in 2010, indicating an established presence, but no registrant or contact details are publicly available. The lack of accessible content prevents evaluation of privacy policies, security posture, or business credibility. The technical infrastructure shows use of nginx and Cloudflare security services, but no further technology stack details can be determined. Overall, the site is effectively blocked from external analysis, limiting risk assessment and compliance verification.

Detected Technologies

nginx

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

No business intelligence data could be extracted due to the site's inaccessibility. The domain age suggests a mature domain, but no information on market positioning, services, or partnerships is available. Without accessible content or metadata, insights into business model, target audience, or industry classification cannot be provided.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture cannot be fully assessed due to the lack of accessible content. The presence of Cloudflare WAF indicates a proactive security measure to protect the site from attacks. However, no security headers or policies are visible, and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. The site is currently blocking access, which may be intentional for security but limits transparency.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Provide a publicly accessible landing page or status page to allow basic analysis and user access.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Cloudflare Detected

The page returns a 403 Forbidden error with Cloudflare challenge platform scripts detected, indicating WAF blocking or security challenge.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
nginx

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Advertising & Marketing

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is inaccessible due to 403 Forbidden error

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

40/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Insufficient contact information

MEDIUM

GDPR requires organizations to provide clear contact details

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:146.192.146.154 ip4:146.192.146.155 ip4:195.1.199.226 ip4:193.215.174.54 ip4:104.40.225.0 ip4:40.68.6.80 ip4:23.253.183.225 ip4:77.94.236.102 ip4:77.94.236.101 ip4:77.94.235.18 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:spf1.emarketeer.com in clude:mailgun.org ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:selector1(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 67 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:miljofyrtarn.no
Issuer:E5
Valid Until:11/11/2025 (67 days)
SANs:miljofyrtarn.no

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:141.193.213.10, 141.193.213.11
Name Servers:
ns1.hyp.netDNS only
ns2.hyp.netDNS only
ns3.hyp.netDNS only
MX Records:
0: miljofyrtarn-no.mail.protection.outlook.com
10: mxb.mailgun.org
10: mxa.mailgun.org

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:146.192.146.154 ip4:146.192.146.155 ip4:195.1.199.226 ip4:193.215.174.54 ip4:104.40.225.0 ip4:40.68.6.80 ip4:23.253.183.225 ip4:77.94.236.102 ip4:77.94.236.101 ip4:77.94.235.18 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:spf1.emarketeer.com in clude:mailgun.org ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The site uses nginx as the web server and is protected by Cloudflare's security platform, which currently blocks access with a 403 Forbidden response. No CMS or additional frameworks are detectable. The absence of metadata, scripts (other than Cloudflare challenge), or external links indicates minimal or no publicly accessible content. Performance, SEO, and accessibility cannot be evaluated. The technical setup prioritizes security blocking but at the cost of accessibility and transparency.
Analyze Another Website