Skip to main content

Is mina-loy.com a Scam? Security Check Results - mina-loy.com Reviews

M

Is mina-loy.com Safe? Security Analysis for Waiting for the redirectiron...

Check if mina-loy.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
Joomla! 1.5WordPress 2.5
Analyzed 9/7/2025Completed 5:39:31 AM
53
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website mina-loy.com is currently inaccessible due to a security challenge page that blocks direct content access. The domain is registered since 2015 with a reputable registrar and hosted on Reclaim Hosting. The visible content is minimal and indicates use of outdated CMS platforms Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5, which are known to have multiple security vulnerabilities. There is no evidence of privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies, nor any contact or business information on the site. The presence of a BitNinja security check suggests some level of protection but also limits content visibility. Overall, the site appears inactive or under maintenance with poor technical and content quality.

Detected Technologies

Joomla! 1.5WordPress 2.5

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the lack of accessible content and business information, it is not possible to determine the company's market position, business model, or target audience. The domain age and hosting provider suggest a small-scale operation. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified. The absence of contact details and policies reduces business credibility and trustworthiness.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is weak, primarily due to the use of outdated CMS versions without visible security headers or HTTPS enforcement details. The domain has clientTransferProhibited status but lacks DNSSEC. The security challenge page indicates some protection but also hinders analysis. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. The site is at risk of exploitation if the CMS is not updated.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Upgrade Joomla and WordPress installations to the latest supported versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Generic Detected

Page shows a security check with redirect and browser integrity check, indicating a WAF or security challenge blocking direct content access.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Description:

Joomla!

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Joomla! 1.5WordPress 2.5
Performance:

slow

Mobile:

poor

Accessibility:

poor

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
25/100
Best Practices:
  • Client transfer prohibited domain status

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is blocked by a security challenge page.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:68.183.24.17 ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1416-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 39 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
9 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(415 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:68.183.24.17
Name Servers:
ns1.reclaimhosting.com
ns2.reclaimhosting.com
MX Records:
0: mina-loy.com
SOA:Serial: 2025071801, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:170ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:68.183.24.17 ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses very outdated CMS platforms (Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5) which are no longer supported and pose significant security risks. Hosting is provided by Reclaim Hosting, and the domain registrar is PDR Ltd. The site currently displays a security challenge page with JavaScript-based browser integrity checks and automatic redirects, indicating a WAF or security service in place (BitNinja). The page lacks modern SEO and accessibility features, and no analytics or marketing tools are detected. Performance and mobile optimization are poor due to minimal content and outdated technology.
Analyze Another Website