Skip to main content

Is miniskypark.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - SIA "APL SKYPARK" Reviews

miniskypark.lv favicon

Is miniskypark.lv Safe? Security Analysis for SIA "APL SKYPARK"

Check if miniskypark.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

HospitalityLatviasmall
JavaScriptCSSHTML5GlightboxVanilla LazyLoad
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 9:16:37 PM
44
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website miniskypark.lv represents SIA "APL SKYPARK", a small local entertainment center in Riga, Latvia, focused on children's leisure activities such as trampoline zones, play castles, party rooms, and autodromes. The business targets families with children and offers services including group visits and gift cards. The site is professionally designed with consistent branding and clear navigation, supporting a positive user experience. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript libraries and a CMS platform called Greativ, with moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS usage but lacks visible security headers and cookie consent mechanisms, which are recommended for GDPR compliance. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy assessment. Overall, the site is safe, family-friendly, and credible but could improve privacy and security transparency.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptCSSHTML5GlightboxVanilla LazyLoad

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company operates in the hospitality sector, specifically in entertainment for children and families. It holds a local market position in Riga, Latvia, with a clear business model based on providing leisure and party services. The presence of partner domains like apolloskypark.lv suggests a network of related entertainment venues. Revenue streams likely include ticket sales, party room rentals, and gift card purchases. The website content and contact information indicate a professional and established operation, though the lack of WHOIS data transparency and cookie consent mechanisms suggest areas for compliance improvement. The company registration number and physical address add to business credibility.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@skypark.lv

Phone Numbers (2)

+3712666****
+3712667****

Company Registration

Legal Name:

SIA "APL SKYPARK"

Registration Number:

40203240993

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, but no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or HSTS are detected. There is no visible vulnerability disclosure or incident response information. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent banner. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified in the HTML content. The absence of security certifications and incident response contacts indicates room for improvement in security culture and readiness. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small business but should be enhanced to meet GDPR and best practice standards.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

SIA "APL SKYPARK"

Description:

Izklaides centrs bērniem, ar atsperīgu batutu zonu, aizraujošu rotaļu pilsētiņu, košām ballīšu istabām, autodromu un mazuļu zonu pašiem mazākajiem

Key Services:
Batutu un rotaļu zonaAutodromsBallīšu istabasDāvanu kartesApliecinājumiGrupu apmeklējumi
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptCSSHTML5GlightboxVanilla LazyLoad
Frameworks:
Greativ 2025.3.1
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
65/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by canonical URL https://)
  • No visible exposed sensitive data

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Facebook, Cloudflare, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a mx include:_spf.zone.eu -all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:-all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 82 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:217.146.69.59
Name Servers:
ns.zone.euDNS only
ns2.zone.eeDNS only
ns3.zonedata.netDNS only
MX Records:
10: zonemx.eu
SOA:Serial: 2025072116, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:134ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a mx include:_spf.zone.eu -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on the Greativ CMS platform with modern front-end technologies including JavaScript libraries like Glightbox and Vanilla LazyLoad for enhanced user experience and performance. The site is mobile-optimized and uses responsive images. However, no explicit hosting provider information is available. Performance is moderate with some opportunities for optimization. Accessibility features are basic, and SEO optimization is present but could be improved with more comprehensive metadata and structured data. The absence of analytics scripts suggests minimal user tracking, which aligns with privacy considerations but limits marketing insights.
Analyze Another Website