Skip to main content

Is minjs.us a Scam? Security Check Results - Global Internet Telemetry Measurement Collective Reviews

G

Is minjs.us Safe? Security Analysis for Global Internet Telemetry Measurement Collective

Check if minjs.us is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherUnited Statessmall
Analyzed 8/4/2025Completed 1:38:47 AM
47
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website minjs.us currently presents no accessible content, with an empty HTML body and no metadata, scripts, or links. The domain is registered to 'Global Internet Telemetry Measurement Collective' based in the US, but the domain creation date is set in the future (February 3, 2025), which raises concerns about legitimacy or data accuracy. There is no evidence of business operations, contact information, or user engagement mechanisms on the site. Technically, the site lacks modern web features, security headers, and privacy policies, indicating a very low digital maturity level. Security posture is minimal with no DNSSEC and no visible HTTPS enforcement. Overall, the site appears inactive or a placeholder, limiting any meaningful security or business analysis.

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the absence of website content and business information, it is not possible to determine the market positioning, business model, or target audience. The registrant organization name suggests a focus on internet telemetry measurement, but no services or products are described. The domain's recent and future-dated registration further complicates trust and credibility assessments. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified. The lack of contact details and policies suggests the business is either not operational or in early development stages.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is weak, with no DNSSEC enabled and no security headers detected. The absence of HTTPS information is a critical issue, though it cannot be confirmed from the data provided. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. The domain registration is transparent but suspicious due to the future creation date. No privacy or cookie policies are published, indicating poor compliance with data protection regulations. Overall, the site is vulnerable to trust and security concerns.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Verify and correct the domain registration date to reflect accurate information.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Global Internet Telemetry Measurement Collective

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

poor

Accessibility:

poor

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is completely empty (blank HTML body).

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

40/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Insufficient contact information

MEDIUM

GDPR requires organizations to provide clear contact details

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

65/100
Score

No DMARC record found

HIGH

DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_incspfcheck.mailspike.net -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all
MTA-STS Details

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

40/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Soon

HIGH

SSL certificate expires in 0 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Self-Signed Certificate

HIGH

SSL certificate is self-signed and not trusted by browsers

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:minjs.us
Valid Until:8/4/2025 (0 days)
SANs:minjs.us

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

65/100
Score

Unregistered MX Record

HIGH

MX record points to unregistered domain: mx2.csof.net

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
0 years(young)
Expiry Risk
low(168 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:34.41.139.193
AAAA Records:2600:1900:4001:96e:8000:1:f9f2:40ba
Name Servers:
ns1.hwrn.net
ns2.hwrn.net
MX Records:
10: mx2.csof.net
10: mx1.csof.net

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_incspfcheck.mailspike.net -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website currently has an empty HTML structure with no metadata, scripts, or external resources. No CMS or frameworks are detected. Hosting is provided by Dynadot Inc as per WHOIS registrar data. The lack of DNSSEC and security headers indicates technical debt and security risks. Performance and mobile optimization cannot be assessed due to lack of content. SEO and accessibility are poor given the absence of any meaningful content or structure. The site requires modernization and implementation of standard web technologies and security best practices.
Analyze Another Website