Skip to main content

Is mintiny.com a Scam? Security Check Results - 承德新擎网络科技有限公司 Reviews

Is mintiny.com Safe? Security Analysis for 承德新擎网络科技有限公司

Check if mintiny.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyChinasmall
HTML5CSS3BootstrapjQueryJavaScript
Analyzed 8/2/2025Completed 1:15:20 AM
47
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

承德新擎网络科技有限公司是一家成立于2022年的中国河北省小型科技企业,专注于网站开发、后台管理系统开发、服务器和数据库维护等技术服务。公司以价格优势和技术实力为核心竞争力,提供企业展示型网站、管理系统、外语网站开发及BUG修复等服务,面向企业客户和需要技术支持的用户。网站内容丰富,结构清晰,支持移动端访问,体现出良好的数字化基础设施和技术成熟度。技术栈主要基于Bootstrap和jQuery,网站性能适中,SEO优化良好,但缺乏高级安全配置和隐私合规措施。安全方面,域名注册信息公开透明且与网站业务一致,域名状态安全,但未启用DNSSEC,缺少安全HTTP头部和安全事件响应联系方式,存在一定安全改进空间。整体风险较低,建议加强隐私政策发布和安全防护措施以提升合规性和用户信任。

Detected Technologies

HTML5CSS3BootstrapjQueryJavaScript

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

该公司定位于中小企业网站及系统开发市场,凭借低价策略和免费运维服务吸引客户,业务模式为项目制收费。旗下拥有多个子域名和合作域名,提供图床、文本处理和Exif查看等辅助工具,显示出多元化产品线。公司注册资本100万元,规模较小,市场定位明确,主要服务河北及周边地区客户。缺少公开的安全认证和隐私合规声明,可能影响部分客户信任。合作伙伴域名显示一定的生态系统建设,未来可通过完善合规和安全体系提升市场竞争力。

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

m*****@mintiny.com

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

当前安全成熟度处于基础水平,网站未检测到HTTPS配置细节,但WHOIS显示域名状态为clientTransferProhibited,具备一定的域名安全保护。缺少安全相关HTTP头部,未启用DNSSEC,未公开安全政策和事件响应联系方式,存在合规和应急响应不足风险。无明显漏洞或敏感信息泄露,未使用第三方追踪或分析工具,降低了隐私泄露风险。建议尽快完善安全头部配置,启用DNSSEC,发布隐私及安全政策,并建立安全事件响应渠道以提升整体安全防护能力。

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

启用并配置DNSSEC以增强域名安全防护

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

承德新擎网络科技有限公司

Description:

承德新擎网络科技是一家专注于网站和系统开发的科技公司。在网站开发,后台管理系统开发,服务器和数据库维护等方面具有专业能力。我们崇尚大道至简的理念,希望科技向简,用科技让生活变得更简单。

Key Services:
企业展示型网站开发管理系统开发对外外语网站/系统开发BUG/故障排查修复服务器部署与维护CMS系统二次开发数据库维护
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5CSS3BootstrapjQueryJavaScript
Frameworks:
Bootstrap
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
40/100
Best Practices:
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

网站为承德新擎网络科技有限公司的企业官网,提供网站开发及服务器维护服务

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.mxhichina.com -all v=spf1 include:spf.qiye.aliyun.com -all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:-all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Soon

HIGH

SSL certificate expires in 21 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

60/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Invalid SPF Record

MEDIUM

SPF record syntax is invalid

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
3 years(established)
Expiry Risk
low(346 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:101.42.165.253
Name Servers:
circle.dnspod.net
city.dnspod.net
MX Records:
5: mx1.qiye.aliyun.com
5: mxn.mxhichina.com
10: mx2.qiye.aliyun.com
10: mxw.mxhichina.com
15: mx3.qiye.aliyun.com
SOA:Serial: 1747904637, TTL: 180s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:61ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.mxhichina.com -all v=spf1 include:spf.qiye.aliyun.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

40/100
Score

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

网站采用Bootstrap和jQuery构建,技术栈较为传统但稳定,页面结构清晰,支持响应式设计,适合移动设备访问。性能表现中等,未检测到高级前端框架或现代化构建工具。缺少SEO丰富的结构化数据和社交媒体元标签,影响搜索引擎表现。无CMS系统迹象,可能为定制开发。托管于DNSPod,域名管理规范。建议逐步引入现代前端技术和SEO优化手段,提升用户体验和搜索排名,同时加强安全配置以降低潜在风险。
Analyze Another Website