Is mix.com Safe? Security Analysis for Mix
Check if mix.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
Mix.com is a technology-driven content curation and personalized discovery platform that enables users to find and share web content tailored to their interests. With a mature domain registered since 1991 and a user base exceeding 146,000 curators, Mix positions itself as a reputable player in the digital content aggregation space. The platform integrates multiple social login options including Google, Facebook, Twitter, and Apple, enhancing user convenience and engagement. The website employs modern web technologies such as Next.js and leverages major cloud hosting via AWS, ensuring a robust and scalable infrastructure. Advertising and analytics are managed through industry-standard tools including Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Twitter tracking, supporting effective marketing and user behavior insights. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforcement, domain registration locks, and use of Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise, although explicit security policies and headers could be improved. Privacy compliance is limited by the absence of visible privacy and cookie policies, which is a notable gap. Overall, Mix.com demonstrates a professional and trustworthy online presence with room for enhanced transparency in privacy and security disclosures.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
Mix operates in the technology sector focusing on content curation and personalized web discovery. Its business model revolves around user-generated content and personalized recommendations, targeting general internet users interested in discovering quality web content. The platform's competitive advantage lies in its integration with major social login providers and a sizable curator community. Revenue streams likely include advertising and partnerships, supported by extensive use of ad networks and tracking pixels. The company shows signs of digital maturity with a modern tech stack and cloud hosting. However, the lack of explicit business contact information and compliance documentation suggests opportunities for strengthening trust and regulatory adherence. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified, indicating an independent operation. The platform's marketing ecosystem is robust, leveraging multiple ad and analytics services to optimize user acquisition and retention.
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The security posture of Mix.com is generally strong, with HTTPS enforced site-wide and domain registration protected by multiple EPP status flags that prevent unauthorized transfers or deletions. The use of Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise adds a layer of bot mitigation. OAuth-based social logins are implemented securely via trusted providers. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options in the HTML content is a weakness that could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. There is no published security policy or incident response information, which limits transparency and preparedness perception. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. Overall, the site demonstrates good baseline security but would benefit from enhanced header configurations and published security governance documents.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with clear GDPR compliance statements.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
Mix
Discover the gems of the web, personalized to you.
good
consistent
Technical Stack
fast
good
basic
good
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enforced
- Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise used
- OAuth login via Google, Facebook, Twitter, Apple
- Domain locked with multiple EPP status flags
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website uses modern web technologies and frameworks.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
HIGHForces HTTPS connections
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Privacy Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
Third-party services without privacy policy
HIGHDetected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Critical sector without clear security compliance
HIGHDetected sectors: transport, digital
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
DMARC not enforcing
MEDIUMDMARC policy is set to "none"
No DMARC reporting
LOWDMARC aggregate reports not configured
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DKIM Selectors Found
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
DMARC Policy Set to None
LOWDMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy
Domain Registration Details
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
LOWNo unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings