Skip to main content

Is mjj.asia a Scam? Security Check Results - MJJ BBS Reviews

mjj.asia favicon

Is mjj.asia Safe? Security Analysis for MJJ BBS

Check if mjj.asia is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
Bootstrap 4.6.2jQuery 3.5.1Popper.jsAsync.jsXiuno BBS CMS+3 more
Analyzed 8/2/2025Completed 4:03:25 PM
42
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

MJJ BBS is a niche Chinese language online community forum centered around Xiuno resources and virtual card discussions. It serves a small but active user base with features such as thread discussions, plugin sharing, daily sign-in, and alliance partnerships. The platform is built on the Xiuno BBS content management system and leverages modern web technologies including Bootstrap and jQuery to provide a responsive and user-friendly experience. While the website demonstrates good content quality and technical implementation, it lacks visible privacy and cookie policies, which impacts its compliance posture. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS but does not implement common security headers, which could expose it to certain web-based attacks. The absence of WHOIS data transparency reduces trust in domain legitimacy, although the active community presence suggests operational legitimacy. Overall, the website is functional and serves its community well but would benefit from enhanced security and compliance measures.

Detected Technologies

Bootstrap 4.6.2jQuery 3.5.1Popper.jsAsync.jsXiuno BBS CMSFontAwesomeBootstrap IconsPrismJS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The website operates as a community-driven forum targeting users interested in Xiuno forum resources and virtual cards, likely appealing to tech-savvy individuals and forum administrators. Its business model revolves around community engagement and resource sharing rather than direct monetization, although some paid plugins are mentioned. The site maintains partnerships with related forums and resource sites, indicating a collaborative ecosystem. Growth indicators include active user participation and regular content updates. However, the lack of formal business information, contact details, and privacy policies suggests a small-scale or informal operation. Strategic opportunities include formalizing compliance, expanding partnerships, and enhancing trust signals to attract a broader audience.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website's security posture is moderate. HTTPS is enforced, ensuring encrypted communication. However, the absence of critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS weakens its defense against common web vulnerabilities like clickjacking and content injection. No evidence of vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data was found in the HTML content. The site lacks visible incident response contacts or security policies, which could delay response to security incidents. The use of plugins and third-party scripts necessitates regular security audits to mitigate risks. Overall, while no immediate critical vulnerabilities are evident, improvements in security headers and incident response readiness are recommended.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS to strengthen web security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

MJJ BBS

Description:

Xiuno资源 虚拟卡等网络资源交流论坛。

Key Services:
forum discussionsresource sharingplugin downloadsdaily sign-in featurealliance/partner links
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Bootstrap 4.6.2jQuery 3.5.1Popper.jsAsync.jsXiuno BBS CMSFontAwesomeBootstrap IconsPrismJS
Frameworks:
Bootstrap
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
55/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by URL https://)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a Chinese language community forum focused on Xiuno resources and virtual cards.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

35/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

42/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 78 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

60/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
0 years(young)
Expiry Risk
low(216 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:160.251.151.159
Name Servers:
blakely.ns.cloudflare.com
fred.ns.cloudflare.com
SOA:Serial: 2378935566, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:58ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern and popular technology stack centered on Xiuno BBS CMS, Bootstrap 4.6.2, jQuery 3.5.1, and FontAwesome icons. The frontend is responsive and mobile-optimized, providing a good user experience across devices. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected in the HTML content. SEO optimization is basic with meta description present but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags. Accessibility features are minimal but present. The site does not appear to use analytics or tracking services, which reduces privacy concerns but also limits marketing insights. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the content. Overall, the technical implementation is solid for a small community forum but could benefit from SEO and accessibility enhancements.
Analyze Another Website