Skip to main content

Is mktextil2025.eu a Scam? Security Check Results - mktextil2025.eu Reviews

M

Is mktextil2025.eu Safe? Security Analysis for mktextil2025.eu

Check if mktextil2025.eu is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
Analyzed 7/31/2025Completed 8:25:29 PM
49
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website mktextil2025.eu currently presents no accessible content, with an empty HTML body and no metadata, scripts, or visible business information. The domain is registered through Cloud DNS Ltd, a DNS hosting provider, but no registrant or business details are available on the site itself. This lack of content and contact information severely limits the ability to assess the business, its market position, or services. Technically, the site lacks any detectable technologies, security headers, or compliance policies, indicating a very low digital maturity level. Security posture is minimal, with no HTTPS or security best practices observed. Overall, the site appears inactive, under construction, or blocked, resulting in a very low trust and credibility score.

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the absence of any business-related content, no insights into market positioning, competitive advantages, or business model can be derived. There are no visible revenue streams, target customer segments, or partnership information. The domain registration via a DNS provider without further business data suggests the site is not currently operational or publicly presenting its business.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is weak, with no HTTPS detected and no security headers present. There are no privacy or cookie policies, no incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, and no data protection officer contact details. This indicates a lack of compliance with GDPR and other security frameworks. The absence of any forms or data collection reduces immediate risk but also reflects poor security hygiene and transparency.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement a valid SSL certificate and enable HTTPS to secure the website.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Generic Detected

Website content is minimal (empty HTML body), indicating possible blocking or content not accessible. No WAF vendor-specific challenge detected but content is effectively blocked or unavailable.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

poor

Accessibility:

poor

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is completely empty with no metadata or visible content.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

15/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Insufficient contact information

MEDIUM

GDPR requires organizations to provide clear contact details

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:213.136.74.22 ip4:161.97.158.212 include:sendgrid.net ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 49 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:mktextil2025.eu
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:9/19/2025 (49 days)
SANs:mktextil2025.eu, *.mktextil2025.eu

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

DNS Records

A Records:172.67.174.66, 104.21.31.4
AAAA Records:2606:4700:3032::6815:1f04, 2606:4700:3031::ac43:ae42
Name Servers:
kip.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
mary.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
SOA:Serial: 2378335987, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:65ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:213.136.74.22 ip4:161.97.158.212 include:sendgrid.net ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website currently has no detectable technology stack, frameworks, or CMS. The hosting provider is identified as Cloud DNS Ltd, but no further infrastructure details are available. The site lacks performance optimization, mobile responsiveness, and accessibility features. The empty HTML structure indicates either a placeholder site or a blocked/inaccessible resource. Modernization and technical development are required to establish a functional and secure web presence.
Analyze Another Website