Skip to main content

Is mmghlinsko.cz a Scam? Security Check Results - Městské muzeum a galerie Hlinsko Reviews

mmghlinsko.cz favicon

Is mmghlinsko.cz Safe? Security Analysis for Městské muzeum a galerie Hlinsko

Check if mmghlinsko.cz is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherCzech Republicsmall
WordPressWooCommercejQueryEasy FancyboxMetaSlider+2 more
Analyzed 7/31/2025Completed 9:30:50 PM
40
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Městské muzeum a galerie Hlinsko is a municipal cultural institution based in the Czech Republic, providing museum and gallery services including exhibitions, cultural programs, and publications. The website serves as an informational and promotional platform targeting local visitors and art enthusiasts. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with WooCommerce integration for e-commerce functionality, employing common plugins for galleries and mobile menus. The site is accessible, mobile-optimized, and uses HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, indicating a good baseline security posture. However, the absence of visible privacy and cookie policies and lack of WHOIS data reduce compliance and trust scores. Security headers are not evident, and no formal vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, suggesting room for improvement in security maturity. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy from a content perspective but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and domain registration transparency.

Detected Technologies

WordPressWooCommercejQueryEasy FancyboxMetaSliderMobile Menu pluginKoko Analytics

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The museum operates as a small-sized cultural entity focused on serving the Hlinsko community and visitors interested in regional art and history. Its business model revolves around exhibitions, cultural events, and sales of publications via an online shop. The website's market position is local/regional with no indication of broader commercial ambitions. Partnerships include local tourism promotion sites and the web design agency. The museum leverages digital tools for visitor engagement but lacks advanced marketing or analytics sophistication. Growth indicators are not explicit, but the presence of current and upcoming exhibitions suggests active programming. The museum's digital presence is consistent with typical municipal cultural institutions.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and no obvious exposed sensitive data. The use of WordPress and common plugins necessitates regular updates to mitigate vulnerabilities. The lack of security headers and absence of documented security policies or incident response contacts indicate gaps in security best practices. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present, limiting transparency for security researchers. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, the site is secure enough for informational purposes but should enhance security controls and compliance to reduce risk.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Městské muzeum a galerie Hlinsko

Description:

Městské muzeum a galerie Hlinsko is a municipal museum and gallery located in Hlinsko, Czech Republic. The website provides information about the museum, its history, crafts, textile exhibits, gallery exhibitions, current and past exhibitions, publications, and visitor information including opening hours and contact details.

Key Services:
Museum exhibitionsGallery exhibitionsCultural events and programsPublications sales via e-shopVisitor information and support
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressWooCommercejQueryEasy FancyboxMetaSliderMobile Menu pluginKoko Analytics
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (implied by WordPress ecosystem)

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Koko Analytics
Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
koko-analytics
Marketing Tools:
Koko Analytics
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Facebook, Twitter, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

55/100
Score

No DMARC record found

HIGH

DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 mx a include:smtp-gw.gigaserver.cz ~all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:~all
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 72 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
8 years(mature)

DNS Records

A Records:185.66.36.78
Name Servers:
1.ns.gigaserver.czDNS only
2.ns.gigaserver.czDNS only
3.ns.gigaserver.czDNS only
4.ns.gigaserver.czDNS only
MX Records:
50: mail.gigaserver.cz
SOA:Serial: 1545516527, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:80ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 mx a include:smtp-gw.gigaserver.cz ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform with WooCommerce for e-commerce capabilities. It uses jQuery and several plugins including Easy Fancybox for image galleries, MetaSlider for slideshows, and a mobile menu plugin for responsive navigation. The site loads external resources from Google Fonts and integrates a custom analytics solution (Koko Analytics). Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. The site lacks advanced technical SEO and accessibility features but maintains a clean and consistent design. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the data. Technical risks include potential plugin vulnerabilities and missing security headers.
Analyze Another Website