Is moho.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Moho
Check if moho.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
The website moho.lv represents a real estate development project focused on modern, sustainable residential buildings in Riga, Latvia. It offers apartments and penthouses with panoramic views in a green and quiet neighborhood. The site is professionally designed with multilingual support and includes cookie consent mechanisms, indicating attention to privacy compliance. However, no direct contact information or detailed company data is provided on the main page. Technically, the site uses Bootstrap, jQuery, WOW.js, and Google Tag Manager, reflecting a moderate level of digital maturity. Security posture is basic with no visible advanced security headers and no exposed vulnerabilities detected in the provided content. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust analysis, but the site appears legitimate and consistent with a small real estate business.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
Moho.lv operates in the real estate sector, targeting residential property buyers in Latvia, particularly in Riga. The business model centers on developing and selling high-quality, energy-efficient apartments and penthouses. The website links to partner projects mohopark.lv and mohogarden.lv, suggesting a network of related real estate developments. The company positions itself as a provider of sustainable and modern housing solutions. The lack of explicit company registration or contact details on the site may limit direct customer engagement but is common in real estate marketing sites. The use of cookie consent and multilingual support indicates awareness of regulatory and market needs.
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website employs HTTPS and includes a cookie consent banner, demonstrating baseline security and privacy compliance. However, no explicit security headers (such as Content-Security-Policy or HSTS) were detected in the provided data, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. No forms or input fields were found, reducing attack surface. The use of Google Tag Manager introduces moderate tracking but no direct vulnerabilities were observed. The absence of visible incident response or security policy pages suggests room for improvement in transparency and readiness. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a marketing site but could benefit from enhanced headers and published security policies.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS to improve site security.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
MOHO – Kaamos mūsdienīgas mājas. A+ enerģijas daudzstāvu dzīvojamās ēkas ar panorāmas skatu - dzīvokļi un penthausi Rīgas zaļajā un mierīgajā apkaimē. Atpūtas zona, augstākās kvalitātes ilgtspējīgas mājas ar jaunākajām tendencēm ēku attīstībā.
good
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
good
basic
basic
Security Assessment
- Cookie consent mechanism implemented
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Privacy Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
EU business without adequate privacy measures
CRITICALEU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
Third-party services without privacy policy
HIGHDetected services: Google Analytics
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Critical sector without clear security compliance
HIGHDetected sectors: energy, transport, digital
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
DMARC not enforcing
MEDIUMDMARC policy is set to "none"
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DKIM Selectors Found
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 68 days
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
DMARC Policy Set to None
LOWDMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP
HIGHPort 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer
Service Exposed: SSH
MEDIUMPort 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings