Is monero.fail Safe? Security Analysis for XMR Nodes
Check if monero.fail is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
The website monero.fail serves as a community-driven platform focused on tracking Monero and Wownero cryptocurrency nodes. It provides users with real-time status information about nodes, highlighting concerns about malicious nodes operated by chain analysis and government agencies. The site encourages privacy-conscious users to run their own nodes or use Tor to mitigate surveillance risks. The platform is funded through donations and offers downloadable configurations and operational security advice. Technically, the site uses standard HTML5 and CSS frameworks like Pure.css and Normalize.css, with a simple but effective design optimized for mobile devices. However, there is no evidence of HTTPS enforcement or advanced security headers, which are critical for protecting user interactions. Privacy compliance is limited, with no visible privacy or cookie policies, and contact information is minimal, limited to a Twitter handle and a contact form. The WHOIS data is privacy-protected, consistent with the site's privacy-focused mission. Overall, the site provides valuable services to a niche audience but would benefit from enhanced security and compliance measures.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
Monero.fail occupies a niche position within the cryptocurrency ecosystem, targeting privacy-focused users of Monero and Wownero. Its business model is community-supported, relying on donations rather than commercial revenue streams. The platform's competitive advantage lies in its curated node tracking and emphasis on operational security. The target customers are technically savvy cryptocurrency users concerned about surveillance. The site links to relevant external resources such as GitHub and YouTube, indicating an engaged community and open-source ethos. Growth indicators are not explicit, but the volume of tracked nodes suggests active usage. Partnerships or subsidiaries are not evident, and the platform operates independently.
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The security posture of monero.fail is moderate but has notable gaps. The presence of CSRF tokens in forms indicates some attention to input security. However, the absence of HTTPS enforcement and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security level. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, limiting transparency and preparedness. The site does not appear to use tracking or advertising scripts, which aligns with privacy principles but also limits analytics for security monitoring. The WHOIS privacy protection is appropriate given the site's focus on privacy. Recommendations include implementing HTTPS, adding security headers, publishing privacy and cookie policies, and establishing vulnerability disclosure and incident response protocols.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement HTTPS with HSTS to secure all user interactions.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
A community-driven website tracking Monero and Wownero cryptocurrency nodes, providing information about node status and encouraging users to run their own nodes for privacy.
good
moderate
Technical Stack
moderate
good
basic
basic
Security Assessment
- CSRF token present in form
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website provides a valuable community service for privacy-conscious Monero users.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
HIGHForces HTTPS connections
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Privacy Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
Third-party services without privacy policy
HIGHDetected services: Twitter, YouTube
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
No DKIM record found
MEDIUMDKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
No email authentication configured
CRITICALDomain is vulnerable to email spoofing
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 77 days
Weak SSL Key Length
HIGHSSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
No DMARC Record
MEDIUMDMARC policy not configured
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Service Exposed: SSH
MEDIUMPort 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings