Skip to main content

Is morganlewis.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP Reviews

morganlewis.com favicon

Is morganlewis.com Safe? Security Analysis for Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP

Check if morganlewis.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

FinanceUnited Statesenterprise
JavaScriptGoogle Tag ManagerOneTrust Cookie ConsentMediaElement.js
Analyzed 9/7/2025Completed 2:15:18 AM
76
Security Score
LOW RISK

AI Summary

Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP operates a comprehensive global law firm website offering corporate, transactional, litigation, and regulatory legal services. The firm targets corporate clients and legal professionals worldwide, positioning itself as a large, enterprise-level professional services provider with a strong market presence. The website reflects a mature digital infrastructure with Sitecore CMS, modern JavaScript libraries, and integrated analytics and cookie consent tools, indicating a good level of digital maturity and compliance with privacy regulations such as GDPR. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforcement and cookie consent mechanisms, though additional security headers and published security policies could enhance trust and compliance. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain registration trust analysis, but the professional content and branding strongly support legitimacy. Overall, the site is well-designed, accessible, and trustworthy, serving its business and compliance needs effectively.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptGoogle Tag ManagerOneTrust Cookie ConsentMediaElement.js

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Morgan Lewis is a leading global law firm with a broad service offering across industries, focusing on corporate and regulatory legal services. The firm leverages a professional services business model targeting enterprise clients. Its digital presence includes strong branding consistency, extensive content resources such as news, publications, and events, and active social media engagement. The firm uses advanced marketing and analytics tools to monitor and optimize user engagement. Despite missing WHOIS data, the firm's market position and content quality indicate a stable and reputable operation. The firm does not publicly disclose detailed security or incident response policies, which could be an area for improvement to align with best practices in legal industry compliance and client trust.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS with a good SSL configuration and uses cookie consent tools to comply with privacy regulations. Security headers are minimal, with only X-UA-Compatible detected, suggesting room for improvement by adding headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were found in the HTML content. The site lacks publicly available security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms, which are important for transparency and client assurance in the legal sector. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by publishing security documentation and implementing additional HTTP security headers.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a detailed security policy and incident response plan on the website.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP

Description:

Morgan Lewis is a global law firm with over 2,200 lawyers and legal professionals providing corporate, transactional, litigation, and regulatory services across all industries.

Key Services:
CorporateTransactionalLitigationRegulatory services
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptGoogle Tag ManagerOneTrust Cookie ConsentMediaElement.js
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Tag ManagerSiteimprove Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Siteimprove Analytics
Marketing Tools:
OneTrust Cookie Consent
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

90/100
Score

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

88/100
Score

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:%{ir}.%{v}.%{d}.spf.has.pphosted.com mx ip4:205.196.206.158/32 ip4:205.196.206.159/32 ip4:205.196.206.160/32 ip4:205.196.207.151/32 ip4:205.196.207.152/32 ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:selector1(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:selector2(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com
Forensic Reports:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 50 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

90/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

DNS Records

A Records:23.100.43.208
Name Servers:
ns1-02.azure-dns.comDNS only
ns2-02.azure-dns.netDNS only
ns3-02.azure-dns.orgDNS only
ns4-02.azure-dns.infoDNS only
MX Records:
10: mxa-00170501.gslb.pphosted.com
10: mxb-00170501.gslb.pphosted.com
20: mx0a-00170501.pphosted.com
20: mx0b-00170501.pphosted.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:94ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:%{ir}.%{v}.%{d}.spf.has.pphosted.com mx ip4:205.196.206.158/32 ip4:205.196.206.159/32 ip4:205.196.206.160/32 ip4:205.196.207.151/32 ip4:205.196.207.152/32 ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on the Sitecore CMS platform, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries including Google Tag Manager and OneTrust for analytics and cookie consent management. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and accessibility features, with a structured navigation system and rich content. Performance is moderate, with potential for optimization in loading times. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, supporting a professional user experience. No outdated or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided HTML content. The site uses external domains primarily for analytics, consent management, and social media integration, all reputable and standard for enterprise websites.
Analyze Another Website