Skip to main content

Is mosscreator.com a Scam? Security Check Results - mosscreator.com Reviews

mosscreator.com favicon

Is mosscreator.com Safe? Security Analysis for MossCreator-TikTok带货达人建联平台-有乐今天

Check if mosscreator.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
ReactAnt Design
Analyzed 8/2/2025Completed 10:21:45 AM
53
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website mosscreator.com is a newly registered domain (December 2023) with minimal publicly accessible content. The site uses modern frontend technologies such as React and Ant Design, indicating a contemporary technical approach. However, the site lacks critical business and compliance information such as privacy policies, cookie consent mechanisms, terms of service, and contact details. The domain registration is consistent and legitimate but very recent, suggesting a startup or new project. Security posture is basic with no advanced security headers or DNSSEC enabled, and no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. Overall, the site appears functional but immature in terms of business maturity and security compliance.

Detected Technologies

ReactAnt Design

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business behind mosscreator.com is not clearly identified on the website or in the metadata. There is no visible company name, description, or sector information. The domain is registered with DNSPod, Inc., a known registrar, but no further business intelligence such as partnerships or certifications is available. The lack of contact information and policies limits trust and credibility. The business model and target audience cannot be determined from the available data.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

Security maturity is low to moderate. The site uses HTTPS but lacks DNSSEC and security headers like Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options. No security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure information are present. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, which reduces privacy risks but also indicates minimal user engagement tracking. The site should improve security configurations and compliance documentation to enhance trustworthiness and regulatory adherence.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
ReactAnt Design
Frameworks:
React
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
55/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website is newly created with minimal content and no visible privacy or cookie policies

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 81 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

60/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
1 years(established)
Expiry Risk
low(121 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:43.174.229.25
Name Servers:
ns3.dnsv2.com
ns4.dnsv2.com
MX Records:
1: mx1.feishu.cn
5: mx2.feishu.cn
10: mx3.feishu.cn

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:407ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using React and Ant Design, indicating a modern JavaScript frontend framework and UI library. Hosting is managed via DNSPod, Inc. The site shows moderate performance and basic mobile optimization. SEO and accessibility features are minimal, with no advanced meta tags or ARIA attributes detected. The HTML content is valid but truncated, limiting full analysis. No CMS or backend technologies are identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure is contemporary but basic, with room for improvement in performance optimization, SEO, and accessibility.
Analyze Another Website