Skip to main content

Is moveup-fashion.cz a Scam? Security Check Results - moveup-fashion.cz Reviews

M

Is moveup-fashion.cz Safe? Security Analysis for Auctria

Check if moveup-fashion.cz is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
JavaScriptVue.jsFont Awesome 6Google reCAPTCHA v3JSPanel+4 more
Analyzed 7/31/2025Completed 4:17:55 AM
53
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website event.auctria.com is a subdomain of auctria.com, which appears to be an event and auction platform. The content provided is minimal, primarily a loading screen with no substantive business or contact information visible. The technical infrastructure uses modern web technologies including Vue.js, Font Awesome, Google reCAPTCHA v3, and several popular fonts and CSS libraries. The site is served over HTTPS, indicating basic security hygiene, and includes bot protection via reCAPTCHA. However, there is a lack of visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies, and no contact information is provided on the page analyzed. The WHOIS query for the subdomain returned no data, which is expected as subdomains are not separately registered. Overall, the site shows moderate technical maturity but lacks transparency and comprehensive content.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptVue.jsFont Awesome 6Google reCAPTCHA v3JSPanelRoboto fontRaleway fontMaterial IconsAnimate.css

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the minimal content and lack of business information on the page, detailed business intelligence is limited. The platform likely serves event organizers and bidders, providing auction-related services. The use of modern web frameworks suggests a focus on a good user experience for event participants. No direct revenue models, partnerships, or certifications are evident from the content. The absence of contact details and policies may impact trust and user confidence.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The site uses HTTPS and integrates Google reCAPTCHA v3, which are positive security indicators. However, no security headers were detected in the HTML content, and there is no visible security or incident response policy. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other regulations. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were observed, but the security posture would benefit from enhanced transparency and additional security controls.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptVue.jsFont Awesome 6Google reCAPTCHA v3JSPanelRoboto fontRaleway fontMaterial IconsAnimate.css
Frameworks:
Vue.js
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
60/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL scheme https://)
  • Google reCAPTCHA v3 integration

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Google reCAPTCHA
Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website content is minimal and appears to be a loading or placeholder page for an event platform.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Cloudflare, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

50/100
Score

Complex SPF record

LOW

Too many include statements can cause lookup limits

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

DMARC Partial Enforcement

LOW

DMARC only applies to 10% of messages

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:sendgrid.net include:spf.mail.intercom.io include:enchanthq.net include:one.zoho.com ~all
DNS Lookups:5/10
Policy:~all
DMARC Details
Policy:none(10% enforcement)
Aggregate Reports:dmarc@auctria.com
Forensic Reports:dmarc@auctria.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

82/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:52.85.49.101, 52.85.49.81, 52.85.49.118, 52.85.49.16
Name Servers:
ns-1133.awsdns-13.orgDNS only
ns-1941.awsdns-50.co.ukDNS only
ns-267.awsdns-33.comDNS only
ns-642.awsdns-16.netDNS only
MX Records:
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:sendgrid.net include:spf.mail.intercom.io include:enchanthq.net include:one.zoho.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website leverages a modern JavaScript framework (Vue.js) and popular UI libraries (Font Awesome, Animate.css). It uses Google reCAPTCHA v3 for bot mitigation. The site loads multiple external resources from trusted CDNs. Performance appears moderate with deferred script loading and use of web fonts. Mobile optimization is basic but present. SEO and accessibility features are minimal, with no meta description or structured data found. The site lacks CMS indicators and hosting provider details are not discernible from the content.
Analyze Another Website