Is mozilla.ai Safe? Security Analysis for Mozilla.ai
Check if mozilla.ai is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
Mozilla.ai is a technology-focused organization dedicated to empowering developers with trustworthy, open-source AI tools. It leverages Mozilla's legacy to build accessible AI solutions such as Any-Agent, Blueprints, and Lumigator, targeting developers seeking transparent and responsible AI integration. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand identity aligned with its mission and parent organization, the Mozilla Foundation. Technically, the site is built on modern web technologies including Webflow CMS, Google Fonts, and Matomo analytics, delivering fast performance and excellent mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though improvements are recommended in security headers and published policies. Privacy compliance is good with clear links to Mozilla's comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, though a cookie consent mechanism is absent. Overall, the site is trustworthy and well-positioned in the emerging AI developer tools market, with a strong community presence via Discord and social media.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
Mozilla.ai operates as an important entity within the technology sector, focusing on open-source AI tools for developers. Its business model centers on community-driven software development and collaboration, supported by the Mozilla Foundation. The organization targets developers and software engineers interested in trustworthy AI, offering tools that simplify AI integration and evaluation. Market positioning is emerging but credible due to Mozilla's brand equity. The company maintains a strong partnership ecosystem including related domains and social media channels. Revenue streams are not explicit but likely derive from community engagement and potential partnerships. Growth indicators include active project development and community outreach. Strategic observations highlight the importance of enhancing security transparency and contact accessibility to strengthen trust further.
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
Mozilla.ai demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced site-wide and no exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries detected. The use of Matomo analytics indicates a privacy-conscious approach to user tracking. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options represents an area for improvement. No published security policy or incident response information is available, which could hinder rapid response to security events. The lack of a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file limits external security collaboration. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by formalizing policies and improving technical controls.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement and enforce security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to harden the site against common web attacks.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
Mozilla.ai
Mozilla.ai is a mission-driven organization focused on making AI trustworthy, accessible, and open-source. It builds tools for developers to integrate, innovate, and collaborate on responsible AI solutions, drawing on Mozilla's legacy of advocating for a free and open web.
excellent
consistent
Technical Stack
fast
excellent
good
good
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enforced
- No exposed sensitive data in HTML
- No visible vulnerable libraries
- No forms with sensitive inputs except newsletter signup
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
No Data Protection Officer mentioned
LOWLarge organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR
Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant
MEDIUMPrivacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Critical sector without clear security compliance
HIGHDetected sectors: energy, transport, digital
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DKIM Selectors Found
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 45 days
Mixed Content Detected
MEDIUM2 resources loaded over insecure HTTP
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
Unregistered MX Record
HIGHMX record points to unregistered domain: pcoqh2djxl62cwukrjj3zmvkg2a2tshne6zrxrcwg43zceoeohra.mx-verification.google.com
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
Domain Registration Details
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
LOWNo unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings