Skip to main content

Is mozilla.social a Scam? Security Check Results - mozilla.social Reviews

M

Is mozilla.social Safe? Security Analysis for 410 Gone

Check if mozilla.social is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 8:13:45 PM
52
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The domain mozilla.social currently hosts a website that returns an HTTP 410 Gone error, indicating that the content is no longer available or the site has been decommissioned. There is no accessible content, metadata, or structured data to analyze. The WHOIS data for this domain is unavailable due to unsupported TLD, with no registrar, creation, or registrant information provided. This lack of data and the inaccessible website severely limit any meaningful business or security analysis. From a technical perspective, the site lacks HTTPS, security headers, and any detectable technologies or frameworks. No forms, external links, or contact information are present, indicating no active user engagement or data collection. The absence of privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies further suggests the site is inactive or abandoned. Security posture is minimal with no visible security best practices implemented. The domain's legitimacy is questionable due to missing WHOIS data and the 410 error response. Overall, the site is not operational, and no business or compliance insights can be reliably derived. Given these findings, the risk assessment is high for any trust or reliance on this domain. Strategic recommendations include verifying domain status with the owner, implementing HTTPS and security headers if reactivated, and publishing clear privacy and contact information to improve trust and compliance.

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

No business intelligence can be extracted from the current website or WHOIS data. The domain appears inactive with no content or company information available. There are no indications of market positioning, business model, revenue streams, or partnerships. The lack of digital presence suggests the domain is either parked, expired, or intentionally taken offline.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture of the domain is poor due to the absence of HTTPS, security headers, and any visible security policies or incident response contacts. The site returns a 410 Gone error, which may indicate decommissioning rather than an active security risk. However, the lack of WHOIS transparency and security best practices lowers trust. No vulnerabilities or malware indicators were detected, but the site is effectively non-functional.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Confirm domain ownership and status with the registrar or Identity Digital to clarify domain lifecycle.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Generic Detected

Website returns a 410 Gone error with minimal HTML content indicating the site is inaccessible or removed.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Performance:

slow

Mobile:

poor

Accessibility:

poor

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website is inaccessible and returns HTTP 410 Gone error

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

40/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Insufficient contact information

MEDIUM

GDPR requires organizations to provide clear contact details

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

95/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 66 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:mozilla.social
Issuer:WR3
Valid Until:11/10/2025 (66 days)
SANs:mozilla.social

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:35.190.14.201
AAAA Records:2600:1901:0:c197::
Name Servers:
ns-1222.awsdns-24.orgDNS only
ns-1809.awsdns-34.co.ukDNS only
ns-382.awsdns-47.comDNS only
ns-758.awsdns-30.netDNS only
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:52ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website currently serves a minimal static error page with HTTP status 410 Gone, indicating content removal. No CMS, frameworks, or technologies are detectable. No scripts, analytics, or external resources are loaded. The site lacks mobile optimization, accessibility features, and SEO metadata. Hosting provider and infrastructure details are not discernible. Overall, the technical implementation is minimal and non-functional.
Analyze Another Website