Skip to main content

Is mpc.org a Scam? Security Check Results - MPC Foundation Reviews

mpc.org favicon

Is mpc.org Safe? Security Analysis for MPC Foundation

Check if mpc.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyUnited Statessmall
WebflowGoogle FontsGoogle Analytics (gtag.js)Plausible AnalyticsjQuery 3.5.1+1 more
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 9:47:04 PM
59
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The MPC Foundation website presents a small, specialized non-profit organization focused on advancing modern cryptography and the multiparty computation (MPC) ecosystem. The site highlights participation in relevant industry events such as Encrypt and SecureFi, targeting cryptography professionals and ecosystem participants. The business model centers on ecosystem advancement and community engagement rather than commercial services. Technically, the site is built on Webflow with modern web fonts, Google Analytics (with IP anonymization), and Plausible Analytics for privacy-conscious tracking. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare and Webflow, ensuring good performance and HTTPS security. However, the site lacks critical privacy and cookie policies, security headers, and contact information, which impacts compliance and trust. The domain is long-established since 1997, with privacy protection typical for tech foundations, and domain locking enabled to prevent unauthorized changes. Overall, the site is professional but basic in content and security posture, with room for improvement in privacy compliance and security best practices.

Detected Technologies

WebflowGoogle FontsGoogle Analytics (gtag.js)Plausible AnalyticsjQuery 3.5.1Cloudflare DNS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The MPC Foundation occupies a niche position in the cryptography and MPC technology sector, focusing on ecosystem development and event participation. Its business model is non-commercial, likely funded by grants or donations, targeting researchers and professionals in cryptography. The foundation leverages partnerships with event platforms like Encrypt and SecureFi to increase visibility. The lack of detailed business contact information and policies suggests a lean organizational structure. The domain age and locking status support legitimacy, while privacy protection is justified given the nature of the organization. The foundation's digital presence is modest but consistent with a specialized technology non-profit.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS and uses IP anonymization in analytics, reflecting basic security awareness. However, the absence of DNSSEC, security headers (such as CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options), and published security or incident response policies indicates gaps in security maturity. No forms or input fields reduce attack surface but also limit user engagement. The domain's locked status and long age are positive trust signals. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended headers, policies, and transparency measures.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC to improve domain name system security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

MPC Foundation

Description:

Advancing modern cryptography and the MPC ecosystem.

Key Services:
Advancing modern cryptographySupporting MPC ecosystemEvent participation (Encrypt, SecureFi)
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WebflowGoogle FontsGoogle Analytics (gtag.js)Plausible AnalyticsjQuery 3.5.1Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks:
Webflow
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • IP anonymization in Google Analytics

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsPlausible Analytics
Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Plausible Analytics
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a small technology foundation focused on cryptography and MPC.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

45/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 mx ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 63 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
28 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(579 days)
Protection Level
moderateDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:51.21.126.187, 16.16.119.222, 13.49.111.177
Name Servers:
guy.ns.cloudflare.com
mira.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2380809829, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:81ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 mx ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern tech stack centered on Webflow CMS, Google Fonts, and analytics tools including Google Analytics and Plausible. Hosting and DNS are managed by Cloudflare and Webflow, providing reliable infrastructure and HTTPS support. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. The site lacks advanced technical security configurations such as DNSSEC and security headers, which are recommended to reduce risk. No forms or interactive elements reduce complexity but also limit data collection capabilities. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced security and privacy features.
Analyze Another Website