Skip to main content

Is mubea-supplier.de a Scam? Security Check Results - Mubea Reviews

mubea-supplier.de favicon

Is mubea-supplier.de Safe? Security Analysis for Mubea

Check if mubea-supplier.de is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

ManufacturingGermanylarge
JavaScriptjQueryFontAwesomeWalkMe
Analyzed 8/1/2025Completed 10:18:24 AM
64
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Mubea operates a supplier portal accessible via the eu.srm.qad.com domain, providing a secure login interface for its suppliers and business partners. The portal is part of Mubea's digital infrastructure to manage supplier relationships efficiently. The website is primarily in German with multi-language support, reflecting its European market focus. The business is positioned as a large manufacturing entity with a B2B supplier management model. Technically, the portal uses a JavaScript-based stack with jQuery, FontAwesome, and WalkMe for user guidance, running on the QAD SRM platform version 6.4.7. The site is functional and accessible without WAF or security challenges blocking content. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS usage and secure login forms, but lacks visible security headers and explicit cookie consent mechanisms. WHOIS data is unavailable, reducing domain registration trustworthiness, though corporate branding and links to Mubea's official site provide legitimacy. Overall, the site is basic in design and content quality, suitable for its purpose but with room for technical and security improvements.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptjQueryFontAwesomeWalkMe

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Mubea is a well-established manufacturing company leveraging digital supplier portals to streamline supplier interactions. The portal targets suppliers and business partners, facilitating secure access and information exchange. The business model is B2B focused, with a strong emphasis on supplier relationship management. The lack of WHOIS data suggests privacy protection or domain registration issues, which could be a risk factor. The company maintains a consistent brand presence and provides privacy policy links, indicating compliance awareness. However, absence of detailed contact information and security policies on the portal limits transparency. The use of WalkMe indicates investment in user experience and onboarding. The portal's market position is stable within manufacturing, but digital maturity could be enhanced with better security and compliance features.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture of the portal is moderate. The site uses HTTPS and secure login forms with support for one-time passwords, indicating multi-factor authentication capabilities. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No incident response or security policy pages are linked, limiting transparency on security governance. The cookie disclaimer is present but lacks an explicit consent mechanism, which may impact GDPR compliance. The missing WHOIS data and domain registration opacity reduce trust in domain legitimacy. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the site would benefit from enhanced security headers, explicit privacy and security policies, and improved compliance mechanisms.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to harden the site against attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Mubea

Description:

Mubea is a manufacturing company providing supplier portal services for business partners and suppliers.

Key Services:
Supplier portal accessSupplier information managementAuthentication and secure login
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptjQueryFontAwesomeWalkMe
Frameworks:
QAD SRM 6.4.7
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
65/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure login form with password and OTP fields

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
WalkMe
Marketing Tools:
WalkMe
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a supplier portal login page for Mubea, a manufacturing company.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

50/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

82/100
Score

Complex SPF record

LOW

Too many include statements can cause lookup limits

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.qad.com include:_spf.google.com include:_spf.createsend.com include:mktomail.com include:amazonses.com include:spf.mailjet.com ~all
DNS Lookups:6/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1224-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Aggregate Reports:dmarc@qad.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

77/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
33 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
medium(27 days)
Protection Level
moderateDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:172.66.0.224, 162.159.140.226
AAAA Records:2606:4700:7::e0, 2a06:98c1:58::e0
Name Servers:
christina.ns.cloudflare.com
ned.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2379525458, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:91ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.qad.com include:_spf.google.com include:_spf.createsend.com include:mktomail.com include:amazonses.com include:spf.mailjet.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The portal is built on a JavaScript-heavy stack with jQuery and FontAwesome for UI elements, and WalkMe for user guidance and tracking. It runs on the QAD SRM 6.4.7 platform, a specialized supplier relationship management system. The site loads multiple external scripts from cdn.walkme.com and related domains, indicating reliance on third-party services for user experience enhancements. The HTML structure is basic but functional, with responsive design elements present but limited. No CMS or hosting provider information is discernible from the content. Performance is moderate with no explicit indicators of optimization or caching. Accessibility features are basic, with some ARIA or semantic enhancements not evident. SEO optimization is minimal with no Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data found. Overall, the technical implementation is adequate for a supplier portal but could be modernized and optimized further.
Analyze Another Website