Skip to main content

Is mulogin.com a Scam? Security Check Results - MULOGIN Reviews

mulogin.com favicon

Is mulogin.com Safe? Security Analysis for MULOGIN

Check if mulogin.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
jQuery 1.11.3Swiper.jsGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsCloudflare DNS
Analyzed 8/2/2025Completed 5:46:06 AM
52
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

MuLogin is a specialized technology company offering an anti-detect browser solution designed to enable users to manage multiple business accounts securely and efficiently. Their product targets e-commerce sellers, affiliate marketers, and social media marketing teams who require isolated browser environments and fingerprint protection to avoid account bans. The company operates on a subscription-based model with multiple pricing tiers and custom plans, positioning itself as a niche player in the browser automation and multi-account management market. The website is professionally designed, with clear navigation and relevant content that supports their business objectives. Technically, the website employs a modern but modest tech stack including jQuery, Swiper.js, Google Tag Manager, and Google Analytics. Hosting is provided by Alibaba Cloud, and DNS is managed via Cloudflare. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly but lacks some advanced accessibility features. Security practices are basic with HTTPS enabled but missing DNSSEC and security headers. Payment processing supports multiple cryptocurrencies and regional payment methods, indicating a global customer base. From a security perspective, the site shows moderate maturity. It uses HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data but lacks explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and cookie consent mechanisms. DNSSEC is not enabled, and no security headers were detected, which are areas for improvement. The WHOIS data is consistent and trustworthy, with no privacy protection masking registrant details, supporting the legitimacy of the domain. Overall, MuLogin presents a credible and professional online presence with a solid business model and technical foundation. However, enhancements in security policies, privacy compliance, and technical security controls would strengthen their posture and customer trust.

Detected Technologies

jQuery 1.11.3Swiper.jsGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsCloudflare DNS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

MuLogin operates in the technology sector, focusing on browser fingerprint protection and multi-account management for e-commerce and marketing professionals. Their competitive advantage lies in providing isolated browser environments and automation capabilities that reduce account bans and improve team efficiency. Revenue streams are primarily subscription-based with tiered pricing and custom enterprise options. The target customers are businesses and teams managing multiple online accounts across platforms. The company has established a broad partnership ecosystem with proxy providers and related services, enhancing their service offering. Growth indicators include active social media presence and continuous product updates. Strategic observations suggest focusing on expanding compliance and security certifications to appeal to enterprise clients.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

s*****@mulogin.com

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The current security maturity level is moderate. The website uses HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data but lacks advanced DNS security (DNSSEC) and security headers, which are critical for protecting against common web attacks. There is no publicly available incident response or vulnerability disclosure policy, which limits transparency and preparedness. GDPR compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism. The use of third-party analytics introduces moderate user tracking. The absence of a dedicated security contact or data protection officer reduces confidence in incident handling. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small technology company but requires improvements to meet higher compliance and enterprise standards.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

MULOGIN

Description:

MuLogin Anti-detect Browser provides independent environmental isolation for each account, enabling users to log in and manage multiple E-Commerce, Social Media Marketing, and Affiliate Marketing accounts on the same computer simultaneously. It aims to save team time, reduce human and account environment costs, and improve teamwork efficiency.

Key Services:
Anti-detect browser with isolated browser profilesBrowser fingerprint protectionMultiple account managementBrowser automation via APIs and Selenium/PuppeteerTeam collaboration with sub-account managementTechnical support
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQuery 1.11.3Swiper.jsGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsCloudflare DNS
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
65/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for analytics

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a professional SaaS provider for anti-detect browser technology.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:zoho.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

67/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

8 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

60/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
3 years(established)
Expiry Risk
none(377 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:47.97.76.64
Name Servers:
angela.ns.cloudflare.com
kellen.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
20: mx2.zoho.com
50: mx3.zoho.com
10: mx.zoho.com
SOA:Serial: 2376142819, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:63ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:zoho.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

40/100
Score

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a traditional web stack using jQuery and Swiper.js for UI components, with Google Tag Manager and Analytics for tracking. Hosting is on Alibaba Cloud with DNS managed by Cloudflare, providing reliable infrastructure. Performance is moderate with mobile optimization in place. The site lacks a modern frontend framework or CMS, which may limit scalability and maintainability. Accessibility features are basic, and SEO is adequately addressed through meta tags and structured navigation. Technical debt is minimal but updating to newer JavaScript frameworks and enhancing security headers would modernize the platform and reduce risks.
Analyze Another Website