Skip to main content

Is multi-s.cz a Scam? Security Check Results - MULTI-S, s.r.o. Reviews

multi-s.cz favicon

Is multi-s.cz Safe? Security Analysis for MULTI-S, s.r.o.

Check if multi-s.cz is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherCzech Republicsmall
WordPress 5.7.12jQuery 3.5.1jQuery Migrate 3.3.2Nivo Slidermb.YTPlayer+2 more
Analyzed 8/1/2025Completed 4:01:05 PM
51
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

MULTI-S, s.r.o. is a Czech company operating since 2003, providing a broad range of services including security, cleaning, towing, and advertising wraps. The company targets local businesses and individuals requiring these services and maintains a stable workforce of approximately 30 employees. The website reflects a small-sized service provider with a focus on professional service delivery and local partnerships. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with common plugins and scripts, offering moderate performance and basic mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but lacks important security headers and privacy compliance documentation. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust verification, though the website content and business information appear legitimate and consistent with the company's claims.

Detected Technologies

WordPress 5.7.12jQuery 3.5.1jQuery Migrate 3.3.2Nivo Slidermb.YTPlayerGallery by SupsysticLightweight Social Icons

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company holds a stable market position in the Czech Republic's security and service sector, leveraging over 20 years of experience. Its business model centers on providing comprehensive security and auxiliary services, supported by partnerships with local firms. The website's partner logos and references enhance credibility. However, the lack of privacy and cookie policies suggests compliance gaps. The company appears focused on local market needs with a straightforward service offering and moderate digital presence.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

m*****@multi-s.cz

Phone Numbers (1)

+4206023*****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication, but lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could expose it to certain web-based attacks. No forms or input fields are present to assess input sanitization or secure data handling. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential GDPR compliance issues. No incident response or security contact information is provided, limiting transparency in security management. Overall, the security posture is basic and would benefit from enhancements to headers, policies, and documented security practices.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance and inform users about data handling.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

MULTI-S, s.r.o.

Description:

Společnost MULTI-S, s.r.o. je ryze českou společností, která je na trhu již od roku 2003. Zabývá se širokým spektrem služeb – od ochrany majetku a osob přes jejich bezpečnost až po úklidové a odtahové služby.

Key Services:
bezpečnostní služby (security services)úklidové služby (cleaning services)odtahová služba (towing services)reklamní polepy (advertising wraps)provozování vlastního PCO a montážní a servisní organizace systémů EZS, EPS, CCTV, ACS, LAN, IT
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPress 5.7.12jQuery 3.5.1jQuery Migrate 3.3.2Nivo Slidermb.YTPlayerGallery by SupsysticLightweight Social Icons
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
55/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is accessible with full content and no blocking detected.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:selector1(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Subdomain Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:alert@dc4.cz
Forensic Reports:alert@dc4.cz

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

67/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

3 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
21 years(mature)

DNS Records

A Records:81.2.194.241
Name Servers:
ns.forpsi.czDNS only
ns.forpsi.it
ns.forpsi.net
MX Records:
10: multis-cz01c.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2025071201, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:177ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress 5.7.12 with jQuery and several plugins for media and UI enhancements. The technical stack is standard but somewhat dated, with room for modernization. Performance is moderate, with no critical errors detected. SEO and accessibility features are basic, and mobile responsiveness is limited. The site uses HTTPS but lacks advanced security headers. No hosting provider information was identified. Overall, the technical implementation supports the business needs but could be improved for better security, performance, and compliance.
Analyze Another Website