Skip to main content

Is muo.cz a Scam? Security Check Results - Muzeum umění Olomouc Reviews

muo.cz favicon

Is muo.cz Safe? Security Analysis for Muzeum umění Olomouc

Check if muo.cz is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherCzech Republicmedium
WordPressYoast SEOGoogle Tag ManagerjQueryReact
Analyzed 8/1/2025Completed 3:29:14 AM
65
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Muzeum umění Olomouc is a well-established cultural institution in the Czech Republic, founded in 2009, focusing on art exhibitions, educational programs, and cultural events. The website serves as a portal for visitors to explore exhibitions, purchase tickets, subscribe to newsletters, and learn about museum activities. It maintains a consistent brand presence and leverages modern web technologies including WordPress CMS, React, and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. The site is optimized for SEO and mobile devices, providing a good user experience. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, although some security headers could be improved. Privacy compliance is evident with a clear privacy policy and cookie policy aligned with GDPR requirements. The domain registration data is consistent and trustworthy, supporting the legitimacy of the museum. Overall, the website is professional, secure, and user-friendly, serving its audience effectively.

Detected Technologies

WordPressYoast SEOGoogle Tag ManagerjQueryReact

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The museum operates as a non-profit cultural entity targeting art enthusiasts and the general public interested in cultural heritage. Its business model revolves around exhibitions, educational outreach, and partnerships with other cultural institutions. The website supports this model by providing ticketing links, e-shop access, and newsletter subscriptions. The museum's market position is strong regionally, supported by a domain age of over a decade and active social media engagement. The partnership with external ticketing and cultural sites indicates a collaborative ecosystem. Revenue streams likely include ticket sales, merchandise, and event hosting. Growth indicators include active event programming and international exhibition participation.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

j*****@muo.cz

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent mechanisms that respect user privacy preferences. The use of a WordPress plugin to prevent user enumeration is a positive security control. However, no explicit security headers (e.g., CSP, HSTS) were detected in the HTML content, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified. Incident response and security policy documentation are not publicly available, which is common for cultural institutions but could be improved for transparency. Overall, the site is secure for its purpose but could benefit from additional hardening measures.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Muzeum umění Olomouc

Description:

Muzeum umění Olomouc is a museum focused on art exhibitions, collections, and cultural events primarily in Olomouc and surrounding regions. It offers exhibitions, educational programs, and partners with other cultural institutions.

Key Services:
Art exhibitionsEducational programsCultural eventsE-shopNewsletter
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressYoast SEOGoogle Tag ManagerjQueryReact
Frameworks:
React
Platforms:
WordPress CMS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Consent management for cookies
  • Stop user enumeration plugin active

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is a professionally maintained museum site with clear cultural focus.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

70/100
Score

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, YouTube

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

65/100
Score

No DMARC record found

HIGH

DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 mx ip4:185.64.219.200 include:spf.protection.outlook.com ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DMARC Details
Policy:none
MTA-STS Details

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

77/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
16 years(mature)

DNS Records

A Records:35.187.33.238
Name Servers:
ns.gransy.com
ns2.gransy.com
ns3.gransy.com
ns4.gransy.com
ns5.gransy.com
MX Records:
10: muo-cz.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2753296366, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:37ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 mx ip4:185.64.219.200 include:spf.protection.outlook.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress 6.5.2 with a custom theme 'iq-theme' and uses React for some frontend components. It leverages Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing, and jQuery for legacy support. The site loads multiple JavaScript bundles asynchronously, indicating a modular approach. Fonts are preloaded for performance optimization. The site is mobile responsive with adaptive images for different devices. SEO is enhanced via Yoast SEO plugin with structured data (JSON-LD) for rich snippets. Hosting appears to be managed by Gransy, consistent with the registrar information. Performance is moderate with room for improvement in caching and script optimization. Accessibility is basic with skip links and ARIA labels but could be further enhanced.
Analyze Another Website