Skip to main content

Is mxana.com a Scam? Security Check Results - MXANA Reviews

mxana.com favicon

Is mxana.com Safe? Security Analysis for MXANA

Check if mxana.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyChinamedium
Bootstrap CSSSwiper JSJavaScriptCustom JS
Analyzed 8/2/2025Completed 3:29:17 AM
58
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

MXANA is a Chinese website analytics and data analysis platform focused on providing free, reliable, and efficient traffic statistics and monitoring services primarily for developers and small to medium enterprises. The platform offers features such as heatmaps, error monitoring, real-time data analysis, and trend forecasting, positioning itself as a comprehensive tool for website and app performance optimization. The website is professionally designed with good content quality and clear navigation, targeting a Chinese-speaking audience with a focus on transparency and trustworthiness, supported by customer testimonials and regulatory compliance indicators such as ICP and public security备案 numbers. Technically, MXANA employs modern front-end technologies including Bootstrap and Swiper JS for responsive design and interactive elements. The site integrates its own JavaScript SDK for analytics data collection, indicating a proprietary analytics infrastructure. While the site appears performant and mobile-optimized, there is no evidence of advanced security headers or explicit privacy and cookie policies, which are critical for compliance and user trust. The absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy and ownership transparency. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS for secure communication, but lacks visible security headers and formalized security or incident response policies. No contact information for security incidents or vulnerability disclosures is provided, which could hinder timely response to security issues. The data collection practices appear extensive via the embedded SDK, but privacy compliance is weak due to missing policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, MXANA presents as a functional and professional analytics platform with a solid business model and market positioning in China. However, the lack of WHOIS transparency, privacy documentation, and security best practices lowers its trust and security posture. Strategic improvements in these areas are recommended to enhance compliance, user trust, and resilience against security threats.

Detected Technologies

Bootstrap CSSSwiper JSJavaScriptCustom JS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

MXANA operates in the technology sector, providing free website analytics and monitoring services to developers and SMEs in China. Its competitive advantage lies in offering comprehensive analytics features without traffic limits or forced upgrades, appealing to cost-conscious users. The business model is freemium-like but currently fully free, likely monetizing through ancillary services or data insights. The platform targets multiple industries including e-commerce, media, and gaming, as evidenced by customer case studies. MXANA's ecosystem includes a community forum and integration capabilities, supporting user engagement and platform extensibility. Growth indicators include high daily active user counts in testimonials and extensive SDK deployment. However, the lack of transparent domain registration and formal privacy policies may impact long-term credibility and partnership opportunities.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

MXANA demonstrates a basic security maturity level with HTTPS usage ensuring encrypted communications. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No public security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure programs are evident, limiting transparency and preparedness. The embedded analytics SDK suggests extensive user tracking, but without clear privacy or cookie consent mechanisms, raising compliance concerns under GDPR and similar regulations. No exposed sensitive data or known vulnerabilities were detected in the provided content. To improve security posture, MXANA should implement comprehensive security headers, publish privacy and security policies, establish incident response contacts, and ensure compliance with data protection laws.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and enforce comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

MXANA

Description:

MXANA专注网站统计与数据分析,以精准、可信、高效的数据服务为核心,累计为千万应用提供流量统计,致力于为开发者及中小企业提供专业的数据工具与解决方案。

Key Services:
网站流量统计热点图分析错误监测实时数据监控趋势分析网站监控与故障提醒
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Bootstrap CSSSwiper JSJavaScriptCustom JS
Frameworks:
Bootstrap
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
40/100

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
MXANA自有统计SDK
Tracking Level:extensive
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
mxana.tacool.com/sdk.js
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content in Chinese language.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

35/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=15552000; includeSubDomains; preload"

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 40 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:www.mxana.com
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:9/11/2025 (40 days)
SANs:www.mxana.com

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:103.51.63.128
Name Servers:
vip3.alidns.comDNS only
vip4.alidns.comDNS only

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website employs a modern front-end stack with Bootstrap for responsive design and Swiper JS for interactive carousels and sliders. The use of a proprietary JavaScript SDK for analytics indicates a custom-built data collection infrastructure. The site is mobile-optimized and features clear navigation and structured content. However, there is no evidence of a CMS or hosting provider details. Performance appears moderate with no obvious broken elements. SEO is supported by meta keywords and descriptions, but accessibility features are basic. The lack of security headers and privacy policies indicates technical debt in security and compliance areas. Opportunities exist to enhance technical robustness by integrating security best practices, improving accessibility, and formalizing privacy controls.
Analyze Another Website