Is my.locker Safe? Security Analysis for Orange Domains
Check if my.locker is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
Orange Domains operates the .locker top-level domain, providing a unique Web3 digital identity solution that bridges traditional Web2 domain names with blockchain-based identities on Bitcoin and Ethereum. The company positions itself as an innovative player in the domain registration and Web3 identity space, leveraging partnerships with established registrars and blockchain ecosystem leaders. Their service targets users seeking a unified digital identity across Web2 and Web3 platforms. Technically, the website is built on Webflow with modern web technologies, integrates Google Tag Manager and HubSpot for analytics and marketing, and employs secure HTTPS and security headers. However, it lacks visible cookie consent mechanisms and explicit security or incident response policies. The security posture is strong with no evident vulnerabilities, but privacy compliance could be improved. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and well-branded, with a clear business model and good user experience.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
The company leverages its ICANN designation and partnerships with Tucows, Hiro Systems, and Trust Machines to establish credibility and market presence. Its business model revolves around domain registration and Web3 identity provisioning, targeting blockchain users and domain registrants. The presence of testimonials from industry leaders and ecosystem partners indicates strong industry relationships. The company appears to be a small but focused technology startup with a niche in blockchain domain services. Revenue likely derives from domain sales and associated digital identity services. The partnership ecosystem and integration with Bitcoin and Ethereum blockchains provide competitive advantages and growth potential.
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced, multiple security headers, and no exposed sensitive data. Use of Google Tag Manager and HubSpot forms is controlled and standard. However, the absence of a published security policy, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure reduces transparency and preparedness perception. No cookie consent banner is present despite tracking scripts, which may pose GDPR compliance risks. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by formalizing policies and improving privacy compliance.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement a visible cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and ePrivacy regulations.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
Orange Domains
.locker is a solution that bridges Web2 domain names with Web3 digital identities. It combines a domain name with a Web3 digital identity that resolves on Bitcoin and Ethereum to give users one name for Web2 + Web3.
good
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
good
basic
good
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enforced
- Use of Google Tag Manager for controlled script loading
- No exposed sensitive data in HTML
- Secure forms with HubSpot integration
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
No Data Protection Officer mentioned
LOWLarge organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR
Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant
MEDIUMPrivacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Critical sector without clear security compliance
HIGHDetected sectors: energy, transport, digital
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
DMARC not enforcing
MEDIUMDMARC policy is set to "none"
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DKIM Selectors Found
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 40 days
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
Unregistered MX Record
HIGHMX record points to unregistered domain: VCPMLO7DHSSITZON76NFQASWDMDKDERMFCDHFMNVMVMFJPSQWTGA.MX-VERIFICATION.google.com
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
DMARC Policy Set to None
LOWDMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
LOWNo unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings