Skip to main content

Is mybee.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - mybee.lv Reviews

mybee.lv favicon

Is mybee.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Mājaslapa

Check if mybee.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TransportationLatviamedium
Nuxt.jsTailwind CSSVue.jsGoogle Tag ManagerCookiebot
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 9:36:09 PM
66
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

MyBee.lv is a Latvian-based car subscription service offering an alternative to traditional leasing and long-term rental. The company provides a convenient subscription model where customers can easily subscribe online and receive a car with all major expenses such as insurance, maintenance, and tire changes included in a fixed monthly fee. The website is built using modern web technologies including Nuxt.js and Vue.js, and incorporates GDPR-compliant cookie consent via Cookiebot. While the site is professionally designed and mobile-optimized, it lacks explicit privacy policy and terms of service pages, and does not provide direct contact information, which impacts trust and compliance perception. The WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain registration transparency. Overall, the site presents a good user experience and moderate security posture but would benefit from enhanced compliance and contact transparency.

Detected Technologies

Nuxt.jsTailwind CSSVue.jsGoogle Tag ManagerCookiebot

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

MyBee targets private individuals and businesses in Latvia seeking flexible and hassle-free car usage options. Their subscription model differentiates them from leasing and rental competitors by bundling insurance, maintenance, and roadside assistance into one fixed monthly payment. The company leverages a modern frontend stack and integrates tracking tools like Google Tag Manager for analytics. The absence of visible business registration or certification details and limited contact information suggests room for improvement in business credibility and transparency. The website content is relevant and well-structured, supporting their market positioning as a convenient car subscription provider.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (2)

i*****@mybee.lv
1*****@sentry.nordcode.io

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS and uses a cookie consent mechanism, indicating basic security and privacy awareness. However, no security headers were detected in the provided HTML content, and there is no visible security policy or incident response contact information. The use of third-party scripts like Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot introduces potential risk vectors that require regular auditing. The lack of explicit privacy and terms pages and absence of vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files highlight compliance gaps. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended headers, publishing security policies, and enhancing transparency.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service accessible from the website footer.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

MyBee offers car subscription services in Latvia, providing customers with an easy way to subscribe to a car online and drive it without worries about maintenance, insurance, or other related services. The service includes insurance, regular maintenance, tire changes, and 24/7 roadside assistance.

Key Services:
Car subscriptionInsuranceMaintenanceTire change and storageRoadside assistance
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Nuxt.jsTailwind CSSVue.jsGoogle Tag ManagerCookiebot
Frameworks:
Nuxt.jsVue.js
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Marketing Tools:
Cookiebot
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

90/100
Score

Weak X-Content-Type-Options configuration

LOW

Current value: "nosniff, nosniff"

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

40/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

Complex SPF record

LOW

Too many include statements can cause lookup limits

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.mlsend.com include:spf.sendinblue.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:sendgrid.net include:mail.zendesk.com include:servers.mcsv.net mx ~all
DNS Lookups:7/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:k2(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:dmarc_agg@vali.email
Forensic Reports:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 77 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:98.71.58.113
Name Servers:
ns1-03.azure-dns.comDNS only
ns2-03.azure-dns.netDNS only
ns3-03.azure-dns.orgDNS only
ns4-03.azure-dns.infoDNS only
MX Records:
10: mybee-lv.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:88ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.mlsend.com include:spf.sendinblue.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:sendgrid.net include:mail.zendesk.com include:servers.mcsv.net mx ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a modern JavaScript framework stack with Nuxt.js and Vue.js, styled with Tailwind CSS. It uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and Cookiebot for cookie consent management. The site is mobile-optimized and has a clean, professional design. Performance appears moderate based on the complexity of the frontend and external resource loading. No CMS or hosting provider information was detected. Accessibility features are basic, and SEO optimization is minimal but present through meta tags and structured data. The absence of visible security headers and incomplete compliance documentation represent technical debt and risk areas.
Analyze Another Website