Skip to main content

Is mybox.pro a Scam? Security Check Results - mybox.pro Reviews

M

Is mybox.pro Safe? Security Analysis for mybox.pro

Check if mybox.pro is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
Analyzed 8/1/2025Completed 1:41:00 PM
45
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website www.mybox.pro currently serves only as a redirect to https://www.mybox.eco/, providing no direct content or business information. The lack of accessible content and absence of metadata, contact details, or security policies indicates a very low digital maturity level. The WHOIS data is malformed and does not provide any registrar or registrant information, which further diminishes trust and transparency. Technically, the site lacks HTTPS enforcement and security headers, exposing it to potential security risks. Overall, the site presents a minimal security posture with no visible vulnerabilities but also no protective measures. The risk assessment is high due to the lack of transparency and security best practices. Strategic recommendations include implementing HTTPS, publishing clear privacy and cookie policies, adding business contact information, and improving website content and technical SEO to enhance trust and compliance.

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the minimal content and lack of business information on the site, it is not possible to determine market positioning, business model, or revenue streams. The redirect suggests the main business presence may be on the mybox.eco domain. No partnership or subsidiary domains were identified. The absence of contact details and trust indicators limits the ability to assess customer segments or growth indicators. The business credibility is low based on the current web presence.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is weak, with no HTTPS detected and no security headers present. The malformed WHOIS data and lack of registrant information raise concerns about domain legitimacy. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. The site does not demonstrate GDPR compliance or data protection practices. There is no evidence of security frameworks or certifications. The absence of contact channels for security incidents further reduces readiness. Overall, the site requires significant improvements to meet basic security and compliance standards.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure user connections.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

poor

Accessibility:

poor

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is minimal and consists solely of a meta refresh redirect to https://www.mybox.eco/

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

40/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Insufficient contact information

MEDIUM

GDPR requires organizations to provide clear contact details

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf-zoner-zmail.zoner.com -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

100/100
Score

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:mybox.pro
Issuer:Encryption Everywhere DV TLS CA - G2
Valid Until:12/8/2025 (129 days)
SANs:mybox.pro, www.mybox.pro

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
4 years(established)
Expiry Risk
low(112 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:217.198.114.186
AAAA Records:2a00:19a0:3:72:0:d9c6:72ba:1
Name Servers:
ns1.regzone.cz
ns1.regzone.de
ns1.regzone.info
MX Records:
15: 15mx.zoner.com
10: 10mx.zoner.com
1: relay.zoner.com
SOA:Serial: 2025071502, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:232ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf-zoner-zmail.zoner.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is implemented as a simple HTML page with a meta refresh redirect to another domain. No scripts, forms, or external resources are loaded. The lack of HTTPS and security headers indicates outdated or minimal technical infrastructure. No CMS or frameworks are detected. The site performance is likely fast due to minimal content but lacks mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO optimization is poor due to absence of meta tags and content. Hosting provider and platform details are not discernible from the provided data.
Analyze Another Website