Skip to main content

Is myflixerz.me a Scam? Security Check Results - myflixerz.me Reviews

M

Is myflixerz.me Safe? Security Analysis for myflixerz.me

Check if myflixerz.me is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
Analyzed 9/4/2025Completed 11:30:27 AM
34
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website ww1.myflixerz.me appears to be a minimal content streaming platform primarily embedding external content via iframes from suspicious domains. The lack of WHOIS data, absence of privacy and cookie policies, and no visible contact or business information indicate a low level of transparency and trustworthiness. Technically, the site lacks modern security practices such as HTTPS enforcement and security headers, exposing it to potential vulnerabilities. The embedded external content raises concerns about the legitimacy and safety of the media offered. Overall, the site presents significant risks from a security and compliance perspective, with minimal business credibility and poor user experience.

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the absence of any identifiable business information, company name, or contact details, the website does not demonstrate a clear market position or business model. The use of a subdomain and embedding of external content suggests it may be operating as a mirror or unauthorized streaming service. There is no evidence of partnerships, certifications, or growth indicators. The target audience appears to be mature users seeking streaming content, but the questionable nature of the content and lack of transparency limit its credibility and potential market acceptance.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture of the website is weak. There is no evidence of HTTPS enforcement or security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options. The embedding of external iframes from suspicious domains increases the risk of malicious content delivery. No privacy or incident response policies are present, and no contact channels for security issues are provided. The WHOIS data is malformed and unavailable, further reducing trust. These factors collectively indicate a poor security maturity level and high risk of exploitation or abuse.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure user connections.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Performance:

slow

Mobile:

poor

Accessibility:

poor

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
20/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:extensive
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
l.cdn-fileserver.com
Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is minimal and primarily an iframe embedding an external domain.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No HTTPS encryption

CRITICAL

GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

0/100
Score

No HTTPS encryption

CRITICAL

NIS2 requires appropriate technical measures including encryption

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

0/100
Score

No HTTPS Encryption

CRITICAL

Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

55/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Expires Soon

HIGH

Domain expires in 14 days

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
1 years(established)
Expiry Risk
high(12 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:162.210.196.166
Name Servers:
ns1.brainydns.comWHOIS only
ns1.magpiedns.comDNS only
ns2.brainydns.comWHOIS only
ns2.magpiedns.comDNS only
SOA:Serial: 2025071603, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:106ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses minimal HTML with inline styles and a single iframe embedding external content. No modern frameworks, CMS, or analytics services are detected. The site lacks meta tags, structured data, or SEO optimizations. Mobile optimization and accessibility are poor, with no responsive design elements beyond a viewport meta tag. The hosting provider and platform cannot be determined from the data. Performance is likely slow due to reliance on external content and lack of optimization. The technical debt is high, and modernization is recommended to improve usability and security.
Analyze Another Website