Skip to main content

Is mykaplan.co.uk a Scam? Security Check Results - Kaplan Reviews

mykaplan.co.uk favicon

Is mykaplan.co.uk Safe? Security Analysis for Kaplan

Check if mykaplan.co.uk is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

EducationUnited Kingdomlarge
BootstrapJavaScriptOpen Sans fontMaterial Icons
Analyzed 9/7/2025Completed 8:53:21 AM
63
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Kaplan operates an educational platform accessible via the MyKaplan login portal, providing users with account management and access to learning resources. The website is professionally designed with consistent branding and targets students and learners primarily in the United Kingdom. The platform leverages modern web technologies such as Bootstrap and custom fonts to deliver a responsive and user-friendly experience. Privacy and cookie policies are clearly linked, indicating attention to regulatory compliance. However, no direct contact information or detailed security policies are present on the login page. Technically, the site uses standard web technologies and frameworks, with a moderate performance profile and good mobile optimization. Security practices include HTTPS usage and form anti-forgery tokens, but there is no evidence of advanced security headers or explicit incident response information. The WHOIS lookup for the subdomain identity.mykaplan.co.uk failed due to it being a subdomain rather than a registered domain, which is consistent with standard domain management practices. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be improved by implementing additional HTTP security headers and publishing clear security and incident response policies. The site content is safe for general audiences, with no adult or questionable content detected. The absence of contact details and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms suggests room for improvement in transparency and user support. The risk assessment indicates a generally trustworthy and professional educational service platform with moderate technical maturity and compliance. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, improving accessibility, and publishing comprehensive security policies to strengthen user trust and regulatory compliance.

Detected Technologies

BootstrapJavaScriptOpen Sans fontMaterial Icons

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Kaplan is a well-established education services provider operating in the UK market, offering digital learning platforms and support services. The MyKaplan portal serves as a centralized access point for students to manage their accounts and access educational content. The business model focuses on delivering educational resources and support digitally, targeting students and learners primarily. Kaplan's market position is strong within the education sector, supported by consistent branding and a professional online presence. The company leverages partnerships and support platforms such as Freshdesk for customer service. There is no evidence of direct sales or contact information on the login page, indicating a focus on existing users rather than direct customer acquisition through this portal. The absence of detailed business registration data on the subdomain is expected and does not detract from the overall legitimacy of the main domain and business operations.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The current security posture of the MyKaplan login portal is adequate but not exemplary. The site uses HTTPS and includes anti-forgery tokens in forms, which are positive security practices. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces the overall security hardening. No explicit security policy, incident response contact information, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present, which limits transparency and user confidence in security incident handling. The WHOIS data for the subdomain is unavailable due to domain naming rules, but this is consistent with subdomain usage and does not indicate malicious intent. Overall, the site appears secure for its purpose but would benefit from enhanced security controls and published policies to meet higher compliance standards such as GDPR and NIS2.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and enforce HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve protection against common web attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Kaplan

Description:

Kaplan provides an online platform for users to manage their accounts and access educational resources and support.

Key Services:
Account managementAccess to learning resourcesSupport services
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
BootstrapJavaScriptOpen Sans fontMaterial Icons
Frameworks:
Bootstrap
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL)
  • Secure password input with show/hide toggle
  • Request verification token in form

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is a login portal for MyKaplan educational services

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

35/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

68/100
Score

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:a._spf.brightspace.com ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1272-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

79/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

HSTS Missing includeSubDomains

LOW

HSTS header does not include subdomains

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

60/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
15 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(232 days)
Protection Level
none
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:45.60.100.52, 107.154.79.52
Name Servers:
ns-1004.awsdns-61.netDNS only
ns-120.awsdns-15.comDNS only
ns-1236.awsdns-26.orgDNS only
ns-1807.awsdns-33.co.ukDNS only
MX Records:
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:135ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:a._spf.brightspace.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern technology stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, custom fonts (Open Sans, Merriweather), and Material Icons for UI elements. JavaScript is used for form validation and UI interactions. The site loads CSS and JS resources from the main mykaplan.co.uk domain, indicating centralized hosting. Performance is moderate with preloading of fonts and scripts to optimize loading times. The site is mobile optimized with responsive layouts and accessible navigation. However, no CMS or hosting provider information is detectable from the HTML content. There is no evidence of third-party analytics or advertising scripts, suggesting a focus on privacy and minimal tracking. Technical debt appears low, but security header implementation and accessibility improvements are recommended to modernize and harden the platform.
Analyze Another Website