Skip to main content

Is myportfolio.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Adobe Reviews

myportfolio.com favicon

Is myportfolio.com Safe? Security Analysis for Adobe

Check if myportfolio.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/aenterprise
JavaScriptNew Relic monitoringAdobe IMS authenticationTypekit fonts
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 2:36:52 PM
63
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Adobe Portfolio is a service offered by Adobe Inc. that enables creative professionals and individuals to quickly build personalized websites to showcase their creative work. It is integrated as part of the Adobe Creative Cloud subscription, positioning Adobe Portfolio as a value-added service within Adobe's extensive suite of creative tools. The website demonstrates a professional and consistent brand presence aligned with Adobe's corporate identity. Technically, the site employs modern JavaScript frameworks, Adobe IMS for authentication, and New Relic for performance monitoring, indicating a mature and well-maintained digital infrastructure. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and monitoring in place, though explicit security headers and privacy policies are not visible in the provided content snapshot. Overall, the site is safe, professional, and trustworthy, serving a clear target audience of creatives seeking portfolio solutions.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptNew Relic monitoringAdobe IMS authenticationTypekit fonts

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Adobe Portfolio leverages Adobe's strong market position in creative software to offer a portfolio building platform bundled with Creative Cloud subscriptions. The business model is subscription-based SaaS, targeting creative professionals and individuals. The platform benefits from Adobe's brand trust and integration with other Adobe services. The lack of explicit contact or privacy information in the snapshot suggests these may be centralized on Adobe's main sites. The external domains used for assets and authentication are consistent with Adobe's ecosystem. No suspicious or affiliate domains were detected. The platform likely generates revenue indirectly by enhancing the value of Adobe Creative Cloud subscriptions.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS and uses New Relic for monitoring, which are positive security indicators. However, no explicit security headers (e.g., CSP, HSTS) were detected in the HTML snapshot, and no published security or incident response policies were found. There is no evidence of vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files. The absence of privacy and cookie policies reduces privacy compliance scores. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved by publishing clear security and privacy documentation and implementing additional HTTP security headers.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish explicit privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance details.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Adobe

Description:

Quickly and simply build a personalized website to showcase your creative work with Adobe Portfolio. Now included free with any Creative Cloud subscription.

Key Services:
Personalized website buildingCreative portfolio showcasing
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptNew Relic monitoringAdobe IMS authenticationTypekit fonts
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of New Relic for monitoring
  • Async loading of authentication scripts

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
New Relic
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
New Relic
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is a subdomain of adobe.com and serves as a portfolio building platform.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

50/100
Score

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

65/100
Score

Weak DKIM Key

HIGH

DKIM selector 'default' uses 272-bit key

Weak DKIM Key

HIGH

DKIM selector 'google' uses 336-bit key

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 exists:%{i}._i.%{d}._d.espf.agari.com include:%{d}.55.spf-protect.agari.com include:_spf.intacct.com IP4:148.163.151.110 -all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(272-bit rsa)
Selector:google(336-bit rsa)
Selector:k1(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:selector2(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Subdomain Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:adobe@rua.agari.com
Forensic Reports:adobe@ruf.agari.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 68 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
38 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(251 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:2.16.56.94, 2.16.56.72
AAAA Records:2a02:26f0:11a::217:9a38, 2a02:26f0:11a::217:9a68
Name Servers:
a1-217.akam.net
a10-64.akam.net
a13-65.akam.net
a26-66.akam.net
a28-67.akam.net
a7-64.akam.net
MX Records:
2: adobe.mail.protection.outlook.com
1: adobe-com.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 11053, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:79ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 exists:%{i}._i.%{d}._d.espf.agari.com include:%{d}.55.spf-protect.agari.com include:_spf.intacct.com IP4:148.163.151.110 -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern JavaScript stack with asynchronous loading of scripts and integration with Adobe IMS for authentication. Performance monitoring is implemented via New Relic. The site is mobile optimized and uses Adobe's proprietary fonts via Typekit. Hosting appears to be on Adobe's infrastructure or AWS, inferred from asset URLs. The HTML is well-structured with appropriate meta tags for SEO and social sharing (Open Graph, Twitter cards). Accessibility features are basic but present. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Overall, the technical implementation is robust and aligned with enterprise standards.
Analyze Another Website