Skip to main content

Is n1.xyz a Scam? Security Check Results - N1 Reviews

n1.xyz favicon

Is n1.xyz Safe? Security Analysis for N1

Check if n1.xyz is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyUnited Statessmall
Next.jsReactTypeScriptRive animationsPartytown (for script offloading)+1 more
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 10:03:14 AM
64
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

N1 is a technology company operating a Layer 1 blockchain platform designed to enable unrestricted scale and ultra-low latency for next-generation onchain applications. The company positions itself as a high-performance blockchain alternative with developer-friendly frameworks and tools, targeting blockchain developers and crypto projects. The website reflects a modern technical infrastructure using Next.js and React, with integrations for analytics and script optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and some best practices, but lacks explicit security policies and privacy compliance documentation. Contact information is limited but present, and investor logos provide trust signals. Overall, the website is professional and functional but could improve in privacy and security transparency.

Detected Technologies

Next.jsReactTypeScriptRive animationsPartytown (for script offloading)Google Tag Manager

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

N1 targets the blockchain technology sector with a focus on high throughput and low latency infrastructure. Their business model revolves around providing a performant blockchain platform and developer frameworks to accelerate decentralized application development. The presence of notable investors and a clear developer focus suggests a growth-oriented startup. Partnerships with Null Studios and active social media presence indicate an engaged ecosystem. Revenue streams likely include developer tools, network usage fees, and incubator programs. The company is positioned as an emerging player in the Layer 1 blockchain market, competing with established chains by emphasizing performance and developer experience.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

h*****@n1.xyz

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS and uses modern web technologies with some security best practices like script isolation via Partytown. However, it lacks visible security headers and does not provide explicit security policies or incident response contacts. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. The absence of a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file limits transparency. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by adding formal policies, headers, and incident response information.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

N1

Description:

N1 is an L1 blockchain designed to enable crypto at unrestricted scale with ultra-low latency, powering next-generation onchain applications. It offers high throughput (100K+ TPS), sub-millisecond latency, and more compute power, aiming to rival traditional centralized systems. The platform provides developer-friendly frameworks such as TypeScript smart contract environment, Rust-based exchange framework, and VM agnostic frameworks.

Key Services:
Layer 1 blockchain networkDocumentation and developer supportIncubator and community engagement
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Next.jsReactTypeScriptRive animationsPartytown (for script offloading)Google Tag Manager
Frameworks:
Next.js
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Partytown to isolate third-party scripts

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
PostHogGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
PostHog
Marketing Tools:
PostHog
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is professionally designed with clear focus on blockchain technology and developer tools.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

65/100
Score

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, YouTube, Cloudflare

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1416-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 71 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
1 years(established)
Expiry Risk
low(171 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:76.76.21.21
Name Servers:
kallie.ns.cloudflare.com
rodney.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2380431255, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:100ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a modern React/Next.js stack with TypeScript and uses advanced techniques like Partytown for script offloading to improve performance. It integrates analytics tools such as PostHog and Google Tag Manager. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Hosting details are not explicit but the site appears performant with moderate loading speeds. There is no evidence of a common CMS, indicating a custom or proprietary solution. Technical risks include missing security headers and incomplete privacy compliance which could impact user trust and regulatory adherence.
Analyze Another Website