Skip to main content

Is nachtsbahn.at a Scam? Security Check Results - Nacht-S-Bahn I Salzburger Verkehrsverbund Reviews

nachtsbahn.at favicon

Is nachtsbahn.at Safe? Security Analysis for Nacht-S-Bahn I Salzburger Verkehrsverbund

Check if nachtsbahn.at is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TransportationAustriamedium
WordPressYoast SEO pluginjQueryFont AwesomeNectar theme+1 more
Analyzed 8/1/2025Completed 9:44:37 PM
53
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Nacht-S-Bahn I Salzburger Verkehrsverbund is a regional public transportation service focused on providing night train services in Salzburg, Austria. The website promotes night S-Bahn lines S1, S11, S2, and S3, targeting local commuters and nightlife participants. The business operates under the Salzburger Verkehrsverbund GmbH umbrella, positioning itself as a reliable and safe transit option during late hours. The site offers links to official transit apps and social media channels, enhancing user engagement and service accessibility. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using common plugins and themes, with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced, but lacks advanced security headers and explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure information. Privacy compliance is basic, with a privacy policy linked on the parent domain but no cookie consent mechanism on the site. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and serves its intended audience effectively, though improvements in security and privacy transparency are recommended.

Detected Technologies

WordPressYoast SEO pluginjQueryFont AwesomeNectar themeVisual Composer (WPBakery)

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company holds a solid position in the regional transportation sector, leveraging partnerships with ÖBB and digital tools like mobile apps to enhance customer experience. Its business model centers on public transit services with a focus on night-time connectivity. The target market includes residents and visitors in Salzburg requiring safe and reliable late-night transportation. The website reflects a medium-sized enterprise with consistent branding and clear service offerings. The partnership ecosystem includes ÖBB and the parent Salzburger Verkehrsverbund GmbH, indicating strong regional integration. Growth potential lies in expanding digital services and improving user engagement through enhanced privacy and security features.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of a security.txt file indicate gaps in security best practices. No incident response contacts or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are provided, which could hinder timely reporting and mitigation of security issues. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism. The site does not appear to use extensive tracking or analytics, reducing privacy risks. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a public information site but could be strengthened to meet higher compliance and security standards.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Nacht-S-Bahn I Salzburger Verkehrsverbund

Description:

Mit der Nacht-S-Bahn kommst du immer gut an. In den Nächten Freitag auf Samstag, Samstag auf Sonntag sowie vor Feiertagen wird die S-Bahn zur Nacht-S-Bahn. Die Linien S1, S11, S2 und S3 bringen dich nach jeder Party sicher nach Hause oder entspannt ans nächste Ziel.

Key Services:
Nacht-S-Bahn Linien S1, S11, S2, S3FahrplanauskunftMobile Apps (Salzburg Verkehr App, ÖBB Scotty)
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressYoast SEO pluginjQueryFont AwesomeNectar themeVisual Composer (WPBakery)
Frameworks:
WordPress
Platforms:
WordPress CMS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Marketing Tools:
Yoast SEO
Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is a regional public transportation service site for Salzburg, Austria.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

70/100
Score

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

28/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 mx a -all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:-all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 84 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

2 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:83.243.60.167
Name Servers:
server1.web4all.atDNS only
server3.web4all.atDNS only
MX Records:
10: server1.web4all.at
SOA:Serial: 2022120502, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:93ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 mx a -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

40/100
Score

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using the Salient theme and WPBakery page builder, supported by jQuery and Font Awesome libraries. SEO is enhanced via the Yoast SEO plugin. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good content structure. Performance is moderate, with no critical errors or broken elements detected. However, the site lacks advanced security headers and cookie consent mechanisms. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from improved security configurations and performance optimizations.
Analyze Another Website