Skip to main content

Is nadacesynot.cz a Scam? Security Check Results - Nadace SYNOT Reviews

nadacesynot.cz favicon

Is nadacesynot.cz Safe? Security Analysis for Nadace SYNOT

Check if nadacesynot.cz is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

Non-profitCzech Republicmedium
WordPressDivi ThemejQueryGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle Analytics+1 more
Analyzed 8/1/2025Completed 11:38:56 AM
44
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Nadace SYNOT is a well-established charitable foundation based in the Czech Republic, founded in 2000. The foundation focuses on providing financial support to organizations and individuals in need, having distributed substantial funds over the years. The website reflects a professional non-profit organization with clear messaging, contact information, and a focus on transparency through published reports and policies. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using the Divi theme, incorporating modern web technologies and standard analytics tools such as Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, though the absence of security headers and incident response information suggests room for improvement. The lack of WHOIS data is a notable gap that impacts domain trust but does not detract from the legitimacy of the foundation as presented on the site. Overall, the website is user-friendly, informative, and trustworthy for its intended audience.

Detected Technologies

WordPressDivi ThemejQueryGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsFont Awesome

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The foundation operates in the non-profit sector, targeting donors and beneficiaries within the Czech Republic. Its business model relies on donations and systematic grant distribution, positioning it as a key player among Czech charitable organizations. The website's partnership with ImperialMedia for development indicates professional digital support. The foundation's transparency through downloadable reports and privacy policies enhances its credibility. Growth indicators include a large number of supported entities and significant funding amounts. The social media presence on Facebook supports community engagement. There is no evidence of commercial subsidiaries or parent companies, emphasizing its independent non-profit status.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

n*****@nadacesynot.cz

Phone Numbers (2)

+4205724*****
+4207372*****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is properly implemented, and a cookie consent mechanism aligns with GDPR requirements. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are present, which could hinder rapid response to security incidents. The use of third-party scripts like Google Analytics and Tag Manager is standard but requires ongoing monitoring for vulnerabilities. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a non-profit informational site but could be enhanced to better protect user data and site integrity.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to improve protection against common web vulnerabilities.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Nadace SYNOT

Description:

Nadace SYNOT is a charitable foundation established in 2000, focused on supporting organizations and individuals in need through donations and systematic support. It is one of the most generous foundations in the Czech Republic, having distributed hundreds of millions of CZK.

Key Services:
Grant supportDonor fundingCharitable activities
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressDivi ThemejQueryGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsFont Awesome
Frameworks:
Divi
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:78.24.233.21 ip4:78.24.233.22 ~all
DNS Lookups:0/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 81 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
12 years(mature)

DNS Records

A Records:85.239.227.188
Name Servers:
ns1.dc-monaco.czDNS only
ns2.dc-monaco.czDNS only
ns3.dc-monaco.czDNS only
MX Records:
20: mail-gw1.synot.cz
10: mail-gw2.synot.cz
SOA:Serial: 2019021104, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:148ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:78.24.233.21 ip4:78.24.233.22 ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress CMS with the Divi theme, leveraging jQuery and Font Awesome for UI components. Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics are used for tracking and analytics. The site loads CSS and JS assets efficiently with caching and optimization plugins. Mobile responsiveness is good, and the design is consistent and professional. However, no advanced hosting or CDN details were detected. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in accessibility and SEO. The absence of security headers is a technical risk. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for a non-profit website but could benefit from enhanced security and performance tuning.
Analyze Another Website