Skip to main content

Is namada.net a Scam? Security Check Results - Namada Reviews

namada.net favicon

Is namada.net Safe? Security Analysis for Namada

Check if namada.net is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
Next.jsReactCloudflare DNSFathom Analytics
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 4:55:23 PM
61
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Namada is a technology startup founded in 2022 that provides a shielded asset hub focused on privacy and cross-chain actions within the multichain blockchain ecosystem. The platform offers innovative privacy layers, unified shielded sets, and reward mechanisms to incentivize asset protection across multiple blockchains. The website presents a professional and modern design built on Next.js and React, hosted with Cloudflare DNS services, and uses Fathom Analytics for minimal user tracking. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protection, but lacks DNSSEC and security headers. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies, and no explicit contact information is provided. Overall, the website is trustworthy and well-positioned in the blockchain privacy niche but requires improvements in privacy compliance and security best practices.

Detected Technologies

Next.jsReactCloudflare DNSFathom Analytics

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Namada targets blockchain users and crypto asset holders seeking privacy and secure cross-chain asset management. Its business model revolves around providing privacy-enhancing technology and incentivizing users through rewards. The company operates in the technology sector with a focus on blockchain privacy solutions. The domain age and registration details align with the startup's founding year, indicating consistency. The website's content quality and branding are consistent and professional, though trust indicators like certifications or testimonials are absent. The company leverages modern web technologies and minimal tracking analytics, reflecting a digital maturity suitable for its market segment.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS and has domain transfer protection, which are positive security indicators. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options represents gaps that could be exploited. No incident response or security policy information is available on the site, limiting transparency. The lack of vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files further reduces the security maturity level. Overall, the security posture is moderate but can be enhanced by implementing recommended headers, enabling DNSSEC, and publishing clear security policies and incident response contacts.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Namada

Description:

The shielded asset hub rewarding you to protect the multichain. Namada introduces shielded set rewards and shielded cross-chain actions for any asset.

Key Services:
Composable Privacy LayerUnified Shielded SetShielded Cross-Chain ActionsReward mechanisms for shielding assets
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Next.jsReactCloudflare DNSFathom Analytics
Frameworks:
Next.jsReact
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Fathom Analytics
Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Fathom Analytics
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:k2(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:hello@namada.net

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 38 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:namada.net
Issuer:E5
Valid Until:10/15/2025 (38 days)
SANs:namada.net

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:63.176.8.218, 35.157.26.135
AAAA Records:2a05:d014:58f:6200::258, 2a05:d014:58f:6200::259
Name Servers:
athena.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
west.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2380593629, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:56ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using modern frameworks Next.js and React, indicating a contemporary and maintainable tech stack. Hosting via Cloudflare DNS provides performance and security benefits. The site loads with moderate speed and is mobile optimized with good navigation clarity. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. However, accessibility features are basic and could be improved. The use of Fathom Analytics indicates a privacy-conscious approach to user tracking. There is no detected CMS, suggesting a custom or framework-based site. Technical risks include missing DNSSEC and security headers, which should be addressed to reduce attack surface.
Analyze Another Website