
Is namada.net Safe? Security Analysis for Namada
Check if namada.net is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

AI Summary
Namada is a technology startup founded in 2022 that provides a shielded asset hub focused on privacy and cross-chain actions within the multichain blockchain ecosystem. The platform offers innovative privacy layers, unified shielded sets, and reward mechanisms to incentivize asset protection across multiple blockchains. The website presents a professional and modern design built on Next.js and React, hosted with Cloudflare DNS services, and uses Fathom Analytics for minimal user tracking. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protection, but lacks DNSSEC and security headers. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies, and no explicit contact information is provided. Overall, the website is trustworthy and well-positioned in the blockchain privacy niche but requires improvements in privacy compliance and security best practices.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
Namada targets blockchain users and crypto asset holders seeking privacy and secure cross-chain asset management. Its business model revolves around providing privacy-enhancing technology and incentivizing users through rewards. The company operates in the technology sector with a focus on blockchain privacy solutions. The domain age and registration details align with the startup's founding year, indicating consistency. The website's content quality and branding are consistent and professional, though trust indicators like certifications or testimonials are absent. The company leverages modern web technologies and minimal tracking analytics, reflecting a digital maturity suitable for its market segment.
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website employs HTTPS and has domain transfer protection, which are positive security indicators. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options represents gaps that could be exploited. No incident response or security policy information is available on the site, limiting transparency. The lack of vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files further reduces the security maturity level. Overall, the security posture is moderate but can be enhanced by implementing recommended headers, enabling DNSSEC, and publishing clear security policies and incident response contacts.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
Namada
The shielded asset hub rewarding you to protect the multichain. Namada introduces shielded set rewards and shielded cross-chain actions for any asset.
good
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
good
basic
good
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enabled
- Domain status clientTransferProhibited
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
No Data Protection Officer mentioned
LOWLarge organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR
Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant
MEDIUMPrivacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Critical sector without clear security compliance
HIGHDetected sectors: transport, digital
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
DMARC not enforcing
MEDIUMDMARC policy is set to "none"
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DKIM Selectors Found
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 38 days
Weak SSL Key Length
HIGHSSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Certificate Details
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
DMARC Policy Set to None
LOWDMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
LOWNo unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings