Is namejarezidence.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Nameja Rezidence - Jaunais projekts Āgenskalnā
Check if namejarezidence.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
The website 'Nameja Rezidence' represents a real estate development project located in Āgenskalns, Latvia. It showcases architectural and construction craftsmanship, targeting potential property buyers or investors interested in residential projects. The site is built on WordPress and integrates modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity for analytics, and Cookiebot for cookie consent management, reflecting a moderate level of digital maturity. The presence of Calendly indicates an intent to facilitate appointment scheduling or customer engagement. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent implemented; however, the absence of explicit privacy policy and security headers suggests room for improvement in compliance and security best practices. The lack of accessible WHOIS data limits the ability to fully verify domain legitimacy and registrant details, which slightly impacts trustworthiness. Overall, the site is professionally designed with good content quality and user experience, suitable for its real estate market audience.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
The business appears to be a small-scale real estate developer or project promoter focusing on residential properties in Latvia. The website content and metadata emphasize architectural quality and location appeal, targeting local or regional buyers. The business model likely revolves around property sales or leasing. The use of third-party services like Calendly and analytics tools suggests a customer-centric approach with data-driven marketing. No direct contact information or detailed company credentials are provided, which could be a limitation for trust-building. The site does not reveal parent company or subsidiaries, indicating an independent or standalone project. The marketing ecosystem includes Google and Microsoft advertising platforms, enhancing reach and lead generation. Strategic partnerships or payment processors are not evident from the data.
Extracted Contact Information
Marketing Intelligence Data
Email Addresses (2)
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
Security measures include HTTPS encryption and a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR principles. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No explicit security or incident response policies are published on the site, and no contact channels for security incidents are visible. The site uses several third-party scripts which should be regularly audited to mitigate supply chain risks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The WHOIS data unavailability restricts full domain trust assessment. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced by implementing recommended headers, publishing privacy and security policies, and providing incident response contacts.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy page detailing GDPR compliance and data handling practices.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
Nameja Rezidence - arhitekta un būvnieku meistarības sakausējums ir Āgenskalna apkaimes jaunā pērle. Nameja Rezidence - ir mājas ar dabas elpu pilsētā
good
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
good
basic
good
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enabled
- Cookie consent mechanism implemented
- No exposed sensitive data in HTML
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is a WordPress-based real estate project site in Latvia.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
HIGHForces HTTPS connections
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Data Protection Officer mentioned
LOWLarge organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR
Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant
MEDIUMPrivacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
DMARC not enforcing
MEDIUMDMARC policy is set to "none"
No DMARC reporting
LOWDMARC aggregate reports not configured
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DKIM Selectors Found
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 39 days
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
DMARC Policy Set to None
LOWDMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP
HIGHPort 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer
Service Exposed: SSH
MEDIUMPort 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings