Skip to main content

Is nanodental.eu a Scam? Security Check Results - Nanodental Kft. Reviews

nanodental.eu favicon

Is nanodental.eu Safe? Security Analysis for Nanodental Kft.

Check if nanodental.eu is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

HealthcareHungarysmall
jQuery 1.12.2 and 2.2.2Google AnalyticsHTML5CSS3Google Fonts (Open Sans)
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 10:24:59 PM
54
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Nanodental Kft. is a Hungarian dental clinic specializing in conservative dentistry, prosthetics, implantology, and oral surgery, serving patients primarily in Székesfehérvár. The website presents a professional image with clear service offerings, multiple dental specialists, and accessible contact information. The business is positioned as a local healthcare provider with a focus on pain-free treatments and modern diagnostics. Technically, the site uses standard web technologies including jQuery and Google Analytics, hosted on secure.co.hu infrastructure. Mobile optimization and SEO are adequately addressed, though some technical debt exists due to older JavaScript libraries. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied and privacy compliance evident through cookie consent and privacy policy, but lacks advanced security headers and explicit security policies. Overall, the site is trustworthy and well-maintained with room for security improvements.

Detected Technologies

jQuery 1.12.2 and 2.2.2Google AnalyticsHTML5CSS3Google Fonts (Open Sans)

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Nanodental Kft. operates in the healthcare sector, focusing on dental services with a small-sized business model. The company leverages a multi-specialist approach to provide comprehensive dental care. Its market position is local and specialized, targeting Hungarian patients seeking aesthetic and implant dental treatments. The website supports business credibility with clear contact details, social media presence, and GDPR-compliant privacy and cookie policies. The absence of parent or subsidiary companies suggests an independent operation. The company’s digital presence is professional but could benefit from enhanced security and technical modernization to support growth and trust.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@nanodental.hu

Phone Numbers (1)

+3670285****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is used, and Google Analytics is configured with IP anonymization, reflecting privacy awareness. However, the use of outdated jQuery versions introduces potential vulnerabilities. No explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. There is no visible vulnerability disclosure or incident response information, which limits transparency in security management. The cookie consent mechanism and privacy policy indicate GDPR compliance, but further enhancements in security policies and technical controls are advisable to strengthen the overall security posture.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Upgrade all JavaScript libraries, especially jQuery, to the latest secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Nanodental Kft.

Description:

Nanodental fogászat, fogpótlás és konzerváló fogászat, Dr. Nagy András fogorvos, a konzerváló fogászat és fogpótlástan szakorvosa.

Key Services:
Esztétikai fogászat (aesthetic dentistry)Fémmentes fogpótlások (metal-free dental prosthetics)Implantológia (implantology)Szájsebészet (oral surgery)Komplex fogászati kezelések (comprehensive dental treatments)
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQuery 1.12.2 and 2.2.2Google AnalyticsHTML5CSS3Google Fonts (Open Sans)
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
65/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS usage implied by URL
  • Google Analytics IP anonymization enabled
  • Cookie consent banner with settings

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is a professional dental clinic site targeting Hungarian patients.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a mx include:liw.hu ~all
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:dmarc-report@liw.hu

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 85 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
9 years(mature)

DNS Records

A Records:195.228.152.136
Name Servers:
ns1.liwintermedia.comDNS only
ns2.liw.huDNS only
ns3.liw.huDNS only
MX Records:
1: mail.liw.hu

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a mx include:liw.hu ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a traditional tech stack with HTML5, CSS3, jQuery (versions 1.12.2 and 2.2.2), Google Fonts, and Google Analytics. Hosting appears to be provided by secure.co.hu, indicating a regional hosting provider. The site includes responsive design elements and basic accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with no explicit indicators of slow loading but some technical debt due to older libraries. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured navigation. There is no detected CMS or modern JavaScript frameworks, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. Opportunities exist to modernize the tech stack, improve security headers, and optimize performance further.
Analyze Another Website