Skip to main content

Is nanyinet.com a Scam? Security Check Results - nanyinet.com Reviews

nanyinet.com favicon

Is nanyinet.com Safe? Security Analysis for 南逸博客 - 专注于资源分享 - 年轻人的潮流文化社区

Check if nanyinet.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
jQueryBootstrapFontAwesomeSwiperWordPress
Analyzed 8/3/2025Completed 3:38:43 AM
54
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

南逸博客 is a Chinese language blog platform focused on sharing programming resources, tutorials, software source codes, and technical learning materials. It targets young people and technology enthusiasts interested in programming, software development, and related technical fields. The website operates as a content sharing platform aggregating various free network resources and tutorials. Technically, the site is built on WordPress CMS using common libraries such as jQuery and Bootstrap, providing a moderate level of performance and mobile optimization. However, the site lacks advanced security headers and privacy compliance features, and no contact or business registration information is available. The absence of WHOIS data raises concerns about domain legitimacy and trustworthiness. Overall, the site offers valuable content but requires improvements in security posture and compliance to enhance trust and professionalism.

Detected Technologies

jQueryBootstrapFontAwesomeSwiperWordPress

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The website positions itself as a niche resource sharing community for young programmers and technology learners. Its business model appears to be content aggregation and sharing without direct e-commerce or subscription services. The lack of clear business registration, contact information, and privacy policies limits its credibility. There is no evidence of partnerships or certifications. The platform likely relies on organic traffic and community engagement. Growth indicators and revenue streams are not discernible from the available data. Strategic improvements in transparency and compliance could enhance market positioning.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website currently exhibits a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled but no visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options. There is no evidence of vulnerability disclosures, incident response contacts, or security certifications. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, which limits user tracking but also reduces insight into user behavior. The missing WHOIS data is a significant trust concern. Overall, the security maturity is low, and the site would benefit from implementing standard security best practices and compliance measures.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and enforce HTTPS with strong SSL/TLS configuration and regularly test it.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

南逸博客-专注于资源分享,编程教程、PHP源码、技术学习、游戏攻略、建站教程、机器人教程、实用软件、软件源码、各种优秀源码、免费网络资源、分享平台、聚集了全网资源、娱乐、技术、教程、软件、线报、源码、等超多优质资源,年轻人的潮流文化社区!

Key Services:
资源分享编程教程PHP源码技术学习游戏攻略建站教程机器人教程实用软件软件源码免费网络资源
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQueryBootstrapFontAwesomeSwiperWordPress
Frameworks:
WordPress
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

35/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

67/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 41 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

6 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

60/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
4 years(established)
Expiry Risk
low(82 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:111.170.158.94
Name Servers:
octans.dnspod.net
truda.dnspod.net
MX Records:
5: mxn.mxhichina.com
10: mxw.mxhichina.com

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:766ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses WordPress CMS with Bootstrap and jQuery libraries, indicating a standard web technology stack. The site loads external CSS and JS resources asynchronously, which helps performance. Mobile optimization is good with responsive meta tags and viewport settings. However, accessibility features are basic and SEO optimization is moderate with meta keywords and descriptions present. Hosting provider and server details are not disclosed. Performance is moderate with no advanced caching or CDN detected. Technical debt is moderate due to missing security and privacy features. Modernization opportunities include adopting security headers, improving accessibility, and enhancing compliance.
Analyze Another Website