Is napim.org Safe? Security Analysis for N/A
Check if napim.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
The domain napim.org is registered since 1996 and appears to represent a non-profit organization based in the United States. However, the website content is currently inaccessible, returning a 403 Forbidden error page likely enforced by Cloudflare security mechanisms. Due to this blocking, no business descriptions, contact information, or policy documents are available for review. The technical infrastructure includes Cloudflare DNS but lacks DNSSEC and visible security headers. The absence of accessible content prevents a thorough assessment of the organization's digital maturity and security posture. The domain registration data is consistent and legitimate, but the lack of public-facing content and policies limits trust and compliance evaluation. Strategic recommendations include resolving access issues, publishing essential policies, and enhancing security headers to improve transparency and compliance.
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
Given the domain age and US registration, the organization behind napim.org is likely established and operates in the non-profit sector. Without accessible content, insights into market positioning, revenue streams, or partnerships cannot be determined. The lack of visible contact details and policies suggests limited digital engagement or a private/internal site. No evidence of advertising, analytics, or marketing tools was found due to blocked content. The organization should consider improving web presence and transparency to enhance stakeholder trust and operational effectiveness.
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website is protected by Cloudflare but currently blocks access with a 403 Forbidden response, which may be intentional for security or access control reasons. No security headers or SSL details are available for analysis. The absence of published security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates low security transparency. The domain registration is consistent and legitimate, but the website's inaccessibility and lack of public security information represent a risk for trust and compliance. It is recommended to enable DNSSEC, implement security headers, and publish security and privacy policies to improve the security posture.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Resolve the 403 Forbidden access issue to allow legitimate users to access website content.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Cloudflare Detected
Website returns a 403 Forbidden page with Cloudflare nameservers indicating access is blocked or restricted by Cloudflare security mechanisms.
Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com
Business Insights
N/A
poor
Technical Stack
Security Assessment
0Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website content is inaccessible due to 403 Forbidden error.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
HIGHForces HTTPS connections
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Privacy Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
Insufficient contact information
MEDIUMGDPR requires organizations to provide clear contact details
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
DMARC not enforcing
MEDIUMDMARC policy is set to "none"
No DMARC reporting
LOWDMARC aggregate reports not configured
No DKIM record found
MEDIUMDKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled
LOWDomain can be deleted without additional verification
DMARC Policy Set to None
LOWDMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy
Domain Registration Details
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
LOWNo unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings