Skip to main content

Is naproxy.com a Scam? Security Check Results - NaProxy Reviews

naproxy.com favicon

Is naproxy.com Safe? Security Analysis for NaProxy

Check if naproxy.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/amedium
JavaScriptVue.js (Nuxt.js framework)Google Tag ManagerBing UET (Universal Event Tracking)
Analyzed 8/2/2025Completed 5:42:27 AM
58
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

NaProxy is a professional proxy service provider offering a wide range of proxy solutions including residential, static residential, unlimited residential, long acting ISP, and static data center proxies. The company claims a global proxy pool of over 90 million IPs across more than 200 countries, targeting businesses and developers requiring reliable IP proxy services for data scraping, ad verification, SEO monitoring, and other use cases. The website is well-designed, user-friendly, and provides comprehensive information about products, use cases, and customer testimonials, positioning NaProxy as a significant player in the proxy service market. Technically, the website leverages modern web technologies such as Nuxt.js (Vue.js framework), Google Tag Manager, and Bing UET for analytics and tracking. The site is fast, mobile-optimized, and SEO-friendly, with secure HTTPS connections. However, there is no evidence of advanced security policies or incident response information publicly available, and cookie consent mechanisms are absent despite GDPR compliance indications. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and does not expose sensitive data in the HTML content. Security headers are not explicitly detected, and no vulnerabilities were identified in the provided content. The WHOIS data for the domain is missing, which raises concerns about domain registration transparency and trustworthiness. This lack of WHOIS information impacts the overall trust score, although the professional presentation and contact details mitigate some concerns. Overall, NaProxy presents a credible and professional proxy service business with strong technical infrastructure and market presence. The main risks relate to domain registration opacity and incomplete privacy compliance mechanisms. Strategic improvements in security transparency and privacy consent would enhance trust and compliance.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptVue.js (Nuxt.js framework)Google Tag ManagerBing UET (Universal Event Tracking)

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

NaProxy operates in the technology sector as a proxy service provider with a medium-sized business profile. Its competitive advantages include a large proxy IP pool, global coverage, and diverse proxy product offerings tailored to various business needs. The business model is subscription and usage-based, targeting enterprises and developers requiring proxy IPs for data collection and verification tasks. Revenue streams likely derive from proxy sales and custom service contracts. The company maintains a referral program to expand its customer base. Partnerships and customer testimonials indicate a growing ecosystem and positive market reception. The parent company is XINGHAN NETWORK TECHNOLOGY CO., LIMITED. Growth indicators include a large IP pool and over 3,000 customers worldwide. The company could benefit from enhanced transparency in domain registration and security policies to strengthen market trust.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (2)

s*****@naproxy.com
b*****@naproxy.com

Phone Numbers (1)

852*******

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

NaProxy demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with HTTPS enabled and no visible exposure of sensitive data. The absence of explicit security headers and published security policies or incident response contacts suggests room for improvement in security maturity. No vulnerabilities or malware indicators were found in the website content. Privacy compliance is partially addressed with a privacy policy and terms of service, but cookie consent mechanisms are missing, which may pose GDPR compliance risks. Incident response readiness and data protection officer contact information are not publicly available. Overall, the security culture appears functional but could be enhanced by formalizing security policies, improving transparency, and implementing cookie consent to meet regulatory requirements.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a detailed security policy and incident response plan on the website to improve transparency and customer trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

NaProxy

Description:

NaProxy is the highest quality proxy with over 90 million IPs in over 200 countries worldwide. NaProxy provides residential IP resource services at the cheapest price.

Key Services:
Residential ProxiesStatic Residential ProxiesUnlimited Residential ProxiesLong Acting ISP ProxiesStatic Data Center ProxiesCustom Proxy Services
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptVue.js (Nuxt.js framework)Google Tag ManagerBing UET (Universal Event Tracking)
Frameworks:
Nuxt.js
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure contact email links

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Tag ManagerBing UET
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Bing Ads
Tracking Pixels:
Bing UET
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

58/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:mxsspf.sendpulse.com include:spf.mxhichina.com -all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:abuse@naproxy.com
Forensic Reports:abuse@naproxy.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

57/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 80 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:172.67.171.186, 104.21.71.209
Name Servers:
dorthy.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
jay.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
MX Records:
10: mxw.mxhichina.com
5: mxn.mxhichina.com

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:mxsspf.sendpulse.com include:spf.mxhichina.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using the Nuxt.js framework, a modern Vue.js-based SSR framework, ensuring fast loading and good SEO. It uses Google Tag Manager and Bing UET for analytics and tracking. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good accessibility features. Performance is fast with preloading of scripts and styles. No CMS was detected, indicating a custom or framework-based site. Hosting provider details are not evident from the content. The technical stack is modern and well-implemented, supporting a professional user experience. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and privacy compliance mechanisms to reduce technical risks.
Analyze Another Website