Skip to main content

Is nationalarchives.gov.uk a Scam? Security Check Results - The National Archives Reviews

nationalarchives.gov.uk favicon

Is nationalarchives.gov.uk Safe? Security Analysis for The National Archives

Check if nationalarchives.gov.uk is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

GovernmentUnited Kingdomlarge
jQuery 1.11.3Modernizr 2.8.3Yoast SEO pluginDS Cookie Consent pluginWordPress 6.7.2
Analyzed 8/2/2025Completed 4:01:51 PM
69
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The National Archives is the official UK government archive and publisher for England and Wales, providing access to over 1,000 years of historical government records. It serves a broad audience including researchers, students, government officials, and the general public interested in UK history. The organization operates as a non-ministerial government department, offering services such as record preservation, research assistance, educational resources, exhibitions, and professional guidance in information management. The website reflects its authoritative position with consistent branding, comprehensive content, and clear navigation. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with a modern but somewhat legacy technology stack including jQuery 1.11.3 and Modernizr. It employs SEO best practices via the Yoast SEO plugin and includes cookie consent mechanisms compliant with GDPR. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good performance and SEO scores. Hosting details are not explicit, but HTTPS is enforced, ensuring secure communications. From a security perspective, the site demonstrates good practices such as HTTPS enforcement and cookie consent management. However, no explicit security headers were detected in the HTML, and the use of an older jQuery version could pose potential risks. There is no publicly visible security policy or incident response contact, and no security.txt file was found. The WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to privacy protections common for government domains, but the domain's .gov.uk TLD and content strongly support legitimacy. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and secure with minor areas for improvement in security header implementation and technology updates. It poses low risk and effectively serves its government archival mission.

Detected Technologies

jQuery 1.11.3Modernizr 2.8.3Yoast SEO pluginDS Cookie Consent pluginWordPress 6.7.2

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The National Archives holds a unique market position as the official UK government archive, providing authoritative access to government records and historical documents. Its competitive advantage lies in its official status, extensive archival collections, and comprehensive public services including research support and educational outreach. The business model is public service-oriented, funded and operated by the government, focusing on preservation, access, and information management standards. Revenue streams may include merchandise sales via the official shop and event participation. The target customer segments include academics, historians, educators, government employees, and the general public. The organization maintains a strong partnership ecosystem with related entities such as the National Archives Trust and Friends of The National Archives. Strategic observations highlight a focus on digital accessibility, public engagement, and maintaining authoritative archival standards.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Phone Numbers (1)

+4402088******

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The National Archives website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR. The absence of visible security headers like Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options suggests room for enhancement. The use of an older jQuery version (1.11.3) could expose the site to known vulnerabilities if not properly mitigated. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency in security governance. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure program was found, which could improve responsible vulnerability reporting. Overall, the site is secure for general public use but would benefit from modernizing libraries, implementing security headers, and publishing security governance documentation.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

The National Archives

Description:

We are a non-ministerial department, and the official archive and publisher for the UK Government, and for England and Wales.

Key Services:
Preservation of government recordsPublishing government archivesResearch assistanceEducational resourcesExhibitions and eventsInformation management guidance
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQuery 1.11.3Modernizr 2.8.3Yoast SEO pluginDS Cookie Consent pluginWordPress 6.7.2
Frameworks:
WordPress
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

excellent

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by https URLs)
  • Cookie consent banner with accept/reject options
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No vulnerable libraries detected in scripts

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Tag ManagerGoogle Analytics 4 (GA4)
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Official UK government website with comprehensive archival and research resources

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

25/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=604800, includeSubDomains"

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "no-referrer-when-downgrade"

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

83/100
Score

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

93/100
Score

Complex SPF record

LOW

Too many include statements can cause lookup limits

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a ip4:89.197.114.128/25 ip4:72.55.140.81 ip4:72.32.24.120 ip4:34.102.239.211 include:amazonses.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:mailcontrol.com include:spf.dynect.net include:shops.shopify.com include:spf-ps.e-shot.org include:mail.ko ha-ptfs.co.uk -all
DNS Lookups:8/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:selector1(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:selector2(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Subdomain Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:dmarc-rua@dmarc.service.gov.uk
Forensic Reports:dmarc-ruf@dmarc.service.gov.uk
MTA-STS Details
Mode:enforce
Max Age:14 days

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
29 years(mature)
Protection Level
none
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:137.221.134.194
Name Servers:
a1.uberns.co.ukDNS only
a1.uberns.comDNS only
b1.uberns.co.ukDNS only
b1.uberns.comDNS only
MX Records:
0: nationalarchives-gov-uk.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2507290004, TTL: 900s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:81ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a ip4:89.197.114.128/25 ip4:72.55.140.81 ip4:72.32.24.120 ip4:34.102.239.211 include:amazonses.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:mailcontrol.com include:spf.dynect.net include:shops.shopify.com include:spf-ps.e-shot.org include:mail.ko ha-ptfs.co.uk -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress CMS version 6.7.2, utilizing plugins such as Yoast SEO for search engine optimization and DS Cookie Consent for cookie management. The front-end uses jQuery 1.11.3 and Modernizr 2.8.3, indicating some legacy technology usage. The site is well-structured with proper meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data for SEO and social media integration. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. The site uses HTTPS exclusively, ensuring secure data transmission. There is no explicit hosting provider information. The technical stack is stable but could benefit from modernization of JavaScript libraries and enhanced security header implementation to reduce technical debt and improve security posture.
Analyze Another Website