Skip to main content

Is naturalnetworks.com a Scam? Security Check Results - naturalnetworks.com Reviews

naturalnetworks.com favicon

Is naturalnetworks.com Safe? Security Analysis for #1 IT Support and Cybersecurity Company in San Diego | Natural Networks

https://naturalnetworks.com

Check if naturalnetworks.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
Analyzed 10/4/2025Completed 1:38:00 AM
61
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website www.naturalnetworks.com appears to be inaccessible or blocked, with WHOIS data indicating the domain is not registered or inactive. There is no meaningful website content, metadata, or structured data available for analysis. The absence of privacy policies, contact information, and security configurations suggests the site is either under development, inactive, or protected by a web application firewall that restricts access. The technical infrastructure cannot be assessed due to lack of accessible data. Security posture is weak with no HTTPS or security headers detected. Overall, the site presents significant trust and legitimacy concerns.

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the lack of accessible content and WHOIS data, no reliable business intelligence can be derived. There is no evidence of company information, market positioning, or business model. The domain's unregistered status contradicts any claims of an operational business presence. No partnerships or ecosystem relationships are identifiable.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Phone Numbers (1)

866*******

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is poor, with no HTTPS detected and no security headers present. The absence of privacy and cookie policies, as well as contact information for incident response, indicates a lack of compliance with common security and privacy standards. The domain's unregistered status further undermines trust. No vulnerabilities or security best practices can be confirmed due to inaccessible content.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Register and maintain valid WHOIS domain registration information to establish legitimacy.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Generic Detected

WHOIS query returned 'No match for "WWW.NATURALNETWORKS.COM"' indicating domain may not be registered or is inactive. Website content is minimal or blocked. No meaningful HTML content or metadata found. Possible WAF or domain inactive.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

WHOIS data indicates domain is not registered or WHOIS lookup failed

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

80/100
Score

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "no-referrer-when-downgrade"

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

58/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

55/100
Score

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

Complex SPF record

LOW

Too many include statements can cause lookup limits

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 mx ip4:98.158.160.0/20 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:servers.mcsv.net include:autotask.net include:spf.mandrillapp.com include:azure.quotevalet.com include:sendgrid.net include:44534518.spf07.hubspotemail.net ip4:98.158.163.0/24 -all
DNS Lookups:8/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:k2(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:dkim(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

42/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 46 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

65/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Expires Soon

HIGH

Domain expires in 29 days

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
24 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
high(28 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:75.2.32.4
Name Servers:
ns1.naturalnetworks.com
ns2.naturalnetworks.com
MX Records:
20: d95153b.ess.barracudanetworks.com
10: d95153a.ess.barracudanetworks.com
SOA:Serial: 864, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:198ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 mx ip4:98.158.160.0/20 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:servers.mcsv.net include:autotask.net include:spf.mandrillapp.com include:azure.quotevalet.com include:sendgrid.net include:44534518.spf07.hubspotemail.net ip4:98.158.163.0/24 -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The technical analysis is limited by the lack of accessible website content and metadata. No CMS, frameworks, or hosting provider information could be identified. The site appears to lack modern web technologies or is blocked by security mechanisms. Performance and technical debt cannot be assessed. The absence of analytics or marketing tools suggests minimal digital maturity.
⭐ Verified Community Reviews

What others say about naturalnetworks.com

Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

out of 5

0 reviews published

Loading reviews…

How did we do?

Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.

Analyze Another Website