Skip to main content

Is naver.com a Scam? Security Check Results - NAVER Reviews

naver.com favicon

Is naver.com Safe? Security Analysis for NAVER

Check if naver.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologySouth Koreaenterprise
JavaScriptNaver proprietary scriptsNDP SDKGoogle site verification
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 1:27:11 PM
64
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

NAVER is a leading South Korean internet portal and search engine offering a wide range of services including search, news aggregation, video content, blogging, and crowdfunding platforms. The website is enterprise-scale with excellent content quality and consistent branding, targeting a general audience primarily in South Korea. Technically, the site employs modern JavaScript libraries and asynchronous script loading to optimize performance and user experience. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly, with fast loading times and clear navigation. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though explicit security headers and privacy policies are not evident in the provided data. WHOIS data for the domain is unavailable from the .com registry, which is unusual but does not detract from the site's legitimacy given its prominence and content. Overall, NAVER demonstrates a mature digital presence with strong business credibility but could improve transparency in privacy and security policies.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptNaver proprietary scriptsNDP SDKGoogle site verification

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

NAVER holds a dominant position in the South Korean internet market as a comprehensive portal and content platform. Its business model revolves around advertising, content distribution, and value-added services such as crowdfunding and donations. The platform integrates multiple media partnerships and offers diverse content types, appealing to a broad demographic. NAVER's ecosystem supports user-generated content and professional media, enhancing engagement and monetization opportunities. The lack of publicly available WHOIS data suggests possible privacy protection or alternative domain registration strategies. NAVER's extensive use of proprietary technologies and ad networks indicates a sophisticated marketing and analytics infrastructure supporting its revenue streams.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS and uses asynchronous loading of scripts to enhance security and performance. However, no explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or Strict-Transport-Security were detected in the provided data, representing an area for improvement. No sensitive data exposure or vulnerable libraries were identified. The absence of visible privacy and cookie policies, as well as incident response contacts, indicates gaps in compliance and transparency. NAVER should consider publishing clear security policies, vulnerability disclosure programs, and appointing a data protection officer to strengthen its security culture and regulatory compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to enhance GDPR and global privacy compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

NAVER

Description:

네이버 메인에서 다양한 정보와 유용한 컨텐츠를 만나 보세요

Key Services:
Search engineNews aggregationVideo contentBlog platformCrowdfunding and donation platform
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptNaver proprietary scriptsNDP SDKGoogle site verification
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of async script loading
  • No visible sensitive data exposure

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
pstatic.net
Tracking Pixels:
ntm.pstatic.net
Marketing Tools:
Naver's own ad SDKs
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is a major South Korean internet portal with extensive content and services.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

60/100
Score

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "unsafe-url"

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, health, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:111.91.135.0/27 ip4:125.209.208.0/20 ip4:125.209.224.0/19 ip4:210.89.163.112 ip4:210.89.173.104/29 ip4:114.111.35.0/24 ip4:61.247.196.0/24 ip4:61.247.197.0/24 ~all
DNS Lookups:0/10
Policy:~all
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:dmarc_reports@worksmobile.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

3 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
28 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(2560 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:223.130.200.236, 223.130.192.248, 223.130.200.219, 223.130.192.247
Name Servers:
ns1.naver.com
ns2.naver.com
MX Records:
10: mx1.naver.com
10: mx3.naver.com
10: mx2.naver.com
20: mx6.mail.naver.com
20: mx5.mail.naver.com
20: mx4.mail.naver.com
SOA:Serial: 2025090505, TTL: 180s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:193ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:111.91.135.0/27 ip4:125.209.208.0/20 ip4:125.209.224.0/19 ip4:210.89.163.112 ip4:210.89.173.104/29 ip4:114.111.35.0/24 ip4:61.247.196.0/24 ip4:61.247.197.0/24 ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

NAVER's website uses a modern tech stack with multiple proprietary JavaScript libraries and asynchronous script loading to optimize performance. The site is well-structured with meta tags for SEO and social media integration via Open Graph and Twitter cards. Mobile optimization is good, with alternate URLs for mobile devices. Hosting details are not explicit but likely robust given the scale. Performance is fast with no visible broken elements. Accessibility features are basic but present. The absence of CMS identification suggests a custom-built platform. Technical risks include lack of explicit security headers and incomplete privacy disclosures, which should be addressed to maintain trust and compliance.
Analyze Another Website