Skip to main content

Is nbzyja.com a Scam? Security Check Results - 招考网 Reviews

Is nbzyja.com Safe? Security Analysis for 招考网

Check if nbzyja.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

GovernmentChinamedium
jQueryCSSJavaScript
Analyzed 8/3/2025Completed 9:16:13 AM
44
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

招考网 is a Chinese government exam information portal specializing in providing comprehensive resources for national civil service examinations, including exam schedules, results, registration portals, and study materials. The website targets prospective civil servants and exam candidates across China, supported by multiple regional subdomains to cover various provinces and cities. The platform positions itself as a professional and trusted source for exam-related information, with a medium-sized operational scale and a founding year indicated as 2025 (though this conflicts with content dates). Technically, the site uses standard web technologies such as jQuery and CSS, with moderate performance and basic mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and domain status protections, but lacks advanced DNS security and HTTP security headers. Privacy compliance is limited, with no visible cookie consent or GDPR indicators. The WHOIS data shows inconsistencies, including a future domain creation date and registrar-listed registrant, which may warrant further verification. Overall, the site is content-rich, professionally designed, and trustworthy for its niche audience but could improve in security and privacy compliance.

Detected Technologies

jQueryCSSJavaScript

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The website operates as an important entity within the government sector, providing essential exam-related services to a large audience of civil service candidates in China. Its business model revolves around information dissemination and facilitating exam registration and results access. The presence of numerous regional subdomains indicates a broad geographic reach and a strategy to localize content. The site maintains partnerships or links with related educational and government service domains, enhancing its ecosystem. Despite the lack of explicit monetization details, the platform likely benefits from traffic and possibly advertising or educational service referrals. Growth indicators include frequent content updates and comprehensive coverage of exam topics. Strategic observations suggest focusing on improving domain registration transparency and enhancing privacy and security policies to strengthen credibility.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and domain status protections that prevent unauthorized deletion or transfer. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options indicates gaps in defense-in-depth strategies. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are published, limiting transparency and readiness for security events. Privacy compliance is weak, lacking cookie consent mechanisms and GDPR indicators. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. Overall, the security posture is functional but could be significantly improved by adopting modern security best practices and compliance frameworks.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

招考网

Description:

招考网为考生提供2025年国家公务员考试时间、面试名单、考试大纲、历年真题、职位表、成绩查询及报名入口等服务。

Key Services:
考试时间发布成绩查询报名入口考试公告职位表考试大纲历年真题
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQueryCSSJavaScript
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
65/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientDeleteProhibited and clientTransferProhibited set

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Baidu linksubmit push.js
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content in Chinese related to national civil service exams.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 31 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

2 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
0 years(young)
Expiry Risk
low(170 days)
Protection Level
moderateDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:103.39.152.169
Name Servers:
ns1.judns.comWHOIS only
ns1.julydns.comDNS only
ns2.judns.comWHOIS only
ns2.julydns.comDNS only

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

0/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

CRITICAL

Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a traditional web technology stack with jQuery and CSS for frontend interactivity and styling. The HTML structure is valid and includes proper meta tags for SEO optimization, including keywords and description in Chinese. The site loads external scripts from Baidu for SEO push services. Hosting details are not explicitly disclosed but the registrar is eName Technology Co., Ltd. Performance is moderate with no evident heavy resources or slow-loading elements. Mobile optimization is basic, with no explicit responsive design frameworks detected. Accessibility features are minimal but the site navigation is clear and structured. Technical debt appears low but modernization opportunities include adopting modern JavaScript frameworks and improving security headers and privacy compliance.
Analyze Another Website